https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277782
Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Michel Lind from comment #3)
Tulio, would you accept a PR that rework the clang16 packaging to be
more
like clang17 (and thus clang16-tools-extra is shipped?
I believe I can do this. Thanks!
Let me start changing llvm16 first.
I also have colleagues who need clang16 binaries that are currently
unshipped
Interesting.
Michel, could you share which projects are depending on clang16 binaries,
please?
Alyssa and Michel, if we distribute the new clang16 binaries on Fedora 40,
would it work for you?
Or do you really need it in older versions?
I'd like to avoid changing stable versions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277782
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...