Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901704
Ben Cotton <bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED
CC| |bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Ben Cotton <bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com> ---
QA failed.
- Publican entities are referenced with &ENTITY; so it should be
"&PRODUCT;"
- Not all replacements make sense. In some cases keeping "Fedora" hard-coded is
more correct:
- Author_Group.xml, Lines 42 and 51 (author affiliations will not change if
this guide is reused for another product)
- Basic_Hardening.xml, Line 32 (the '16's only make sense in a Fedora
context), Line 41 (the '9' only makes sense in a Fedora context)
- Book_Info.xml, Lines 7,10,13 (I think Publican has problems with entities
in the *_Info.xml files. It makes sense to leave 'Fedora' in this file anyway,
since any reuse will necessarily involve editing this file)
- Encryption.xml, Line 21 (the '9' only makes sense in a Fedora context)
- Exploits.xml, Line 35 (the '12' only makes sense in a Fedora context)
- Firewall.xml, Line 621 (the '12' only makes sense in a Fedora context)
- LUKSDiskEncryption.xml, Lines 13,61 (the '9' only makes sense in a Fedora
context)
- Nmap.xml, Line 11 (the '10' only makes sense in a Fedora context)
- Revision_History.xml - revert all references back to 'Fedora'
- SSO_Overview.xml, Line 67 (the '5.2' only makes sense in a Fedora context)
- Secure_Installation.xml, Line 28 (the '9' only makes sense in a Fedora
context)
Unrelated observation:
Kerberos.xml, Line 331: the < and > saround 'version-number' should
be
removed. DocBook's <replaceable> tag pair will properly format the file name.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.