[Bug 1662306] New: TigerVNC Configuration Page out of date
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662306
Bug ID: 1662306
Summary: TigerVNC Configuration Page out of date
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: medium
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: colin.henry(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Documentation does not reflect current file configuration
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 29
How reproducible:
Try and follow the instructions on the configuration page, it tells you to
change settings that aren't there. For instance, users are told to edit the
and change:
ExecStart=/sbin/runuser -l USER -c "/usr/bin/vncserver %i -geometry 1280x1024"
PIDFile=/home/USER/.vnc/%H%i.pid
Whereas the actual file contains:
ExecStart=/usr/bin/vncserver -autokill %i
PIDFile=/home/<USER>/.vnc/%H%i.pid
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to the documentation page:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f29/system-administrators-gui...
2. Install tigervnc-server
3. Look at the configuration file /lib/systemd/system/vncserver@.service
Actual results:
The files differ significantly, also following the instructions in the
configuration file fails to start vnc successfully, but I'll file a bug for
that separately.
Expected results:
Configuration documentation should match the files on the host
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
3 weeks, 6 days
[Bug 1694217] New: dnf man page does not discuss a dry run
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694217
Bug ID: 1694217
Summary: dnf man page does not discuss a dry run
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: docs-requests
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: noloader(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I'm trying to figure out how to test a 'dnf remove'. I tried 'dnf remove
--dry-run' but dnf retirned "dnf remove: error: unrecognized arguments:
--dry-run".
The man page does not discuss how to perform a dry run.
Please add a treatment for performing a dry run.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
4 years, 7 months
[Bug 1687654] New: %posttrans $1's value is incorrectly documented
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687654
Bug ID: 1687654
Summary: %posttrans $1's value is incorrectly documented
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Status: NEW
Component: packager-guide
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: t0dd(a)protonmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pkovar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_sy...
For %posttrans, it is listed that $1 will be 0 for during both installs and
upgrades. I have not tested installs yet, but at least for upgrades, the value
is 1. Not 0.
Also... this document needs a bunch of editing. Lots of obvious typos and just
needs some proofreading. Is there a git repo for this stuff? If so, heck, I
would fix it myself.
Anyway... bug. Thanks! -taw (or t0dd)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
5 years, 3 months