[Bug 1247255] New: Typo in Keyboard Layout - wrong side of the list
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247255
Bug ID: 1247255
Summary: Typo in Keyboard Layout - wrong side of the list
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
There is a wrong side of "a window listing all currently configured layouts" in
the Keyboard Layout section of the IG. The IG now reads "The right half of the
screen contains a window listing all currently configured layouts." However,
the window is actually on the left side.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See the line 33 of the KeyboardSpoke.xml
2.
3.
Actual results:
The right half of the screen contains a window listing all currently configured
layouts.
Expected results:
The left half of the screen contains a window listing all currently configured
layouts.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 1192174] New: Unhelpful links on LXDE spin page
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192174
Bug ID: 1192174
Summary: Unhelpful links on LXDE spin page
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: medium
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jhhaynes(a)earthlink.net
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
Several "how to use this file" links on the LXDE spins web page simply point
to the top Fedora documentation page. This is unhelpful when you need to know
how to use this file.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
F21
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Bring up F21 LXDE spin web page
2.Click on any "how to use this file link"
3.
Actual results:
Gets to top of Fedora documentation tree
Expected results:
Should tell exactly how to use this file
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 1247229] New: Typo in Date & Time section - misspelled NTP
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247229
Bug ID: 1247229
Summary: Typo in Date & Time section - misspelled NTP
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
There is a misspelled Network Time Protocol in the Date & Time section of the
IG. The IG now reads, in the 5th para/message about setting the Network Time,
Network Time PROTOL.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See line 36 of the DateTimeSpoke.xml
2.
3.
Actual results:
Network Time Protol (NTP)
Expected results:
Network Time Protocol (NTP)
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 1152883] New: Local replication of Product installation trees
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152883
Bug ID: 1152883
Summary: Local replication of Product installation trees
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
It doesn't look like there will be a DVD image, the traditional source in our
instructions for site-provided installation repos. Consider conjuring up a
procedure explaining how an administrator could obtain a mirror of the
installation tree for each Product (whatever anaconda is pointed at for the
netinstalls) without having to pull in the entire repo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 1244513] New: dnf rebuild --what to do to recover from database crash
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244513
Bug ID: 1244513
Summary: dnf rebuild --what to do to recover from database
crash
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: high
Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com
Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Part way through dnf update the application emitted an error message along with
instructions to perform a dnf rebuild.
dnf rebuild is not in the man pages, or in Fedora Documents that I looked at.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Random or when dnf encounters a database inconsistancy
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
No information within Fedora documentation. Found information on the web
Expected results:
dnf rebuild should be part of the internal dnf options and should also be
included in the man/info pages.
Additional info:
Found this information on the web...
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/rebuilding-corrupted-rpm-database.html
rm -rf /var
# cd /var/lib
# rm __db*
Rebuild RPM database:
# rpm --rebuilddb
# rpmdb_verify Packages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 8 months
[Bug 979158] New: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens windows when you hot add virtio drives
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979158
Bug ID: 979158
Summary: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens
windows when you hot add virtio drives
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: virtualization-deployment-guide
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: lbailey(a)redhat.com
Reporter: robert.rupert(a)servicemesh.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: lbailey(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Windows Blue Screens in KVM when using the latest virtio driver 1-59. When hot
adding scsi drive
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
fresh install with virtio scsi driver 1-59,=. Then hot add virtio scsi driver
in windows 7, 2008r2 and 2012
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
using the previose version 1-52 works fine
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 8 months
[Bug 1258094] New: [RFE] Cover how to submit release notes updates in Alpha & Beta release notes
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258094
Bug ID: 1258094
Summary: [RFE] Cover how to submit release notes updates in
Alpha & Beta release notes
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: ncoghlan(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
As noted in bug #1258093, there were some items I was expecting to see in the
Fedora 23 Alpha release notes that aren't currently there. Finding the
release-notes component in the Fedora Documentation project on
bugzilla.redhat.com was something I had to guess at as being the right place to
file an RFE related to that.
During the Alpha and Beta cycle, it would potentially be helpful if there was a
Fedora contributor focused addendum to the Release Notes that detailed how to
submit suggestions for additions and improvements (Joe Brockmeier mentioned
encouraging folks to collaborate on producing good release notes during his
Fedora Marketing talk at Flock earlier in the month, so this may be a good way
to help with that effort).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 9 months
[Bug 1258093] New: [RFE] Cover still-in-progress system wide changes in Alpha release notes
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258093
Bug ID: 1258093
Summary: [RFE] Cover still-in-progress system wide changes in
Alpha release notes
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: ncoghlan(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
There are a couple of changes I was expecting to see in the F23 Alpha (such as
Python-3-as-default and dnf based system upgrades), which aren't mentioned in
the current release notes.
It would be good if the Alpha release notes covered the state of the approved
system wide changes that are still *intended* to land by the Beta release, so
it's clear which changes are still in progress (and may need help with
testing), and which have been postponed to the next release.
This could be in a separate specific-to-the-Alpha-releases section of the
release notes aimed at Fedora contributors, rather than being part of the
release notes in general.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 9 months
[Bug 1176580] no rescue mode in menu
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176580
Chris Lumens <clumens(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |janneggers(a)hotmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Chris Lumens <clumens(a)redhat.com> ---
*** Bug 1003672 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 9 months