[Bug 1008204] New: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008204
Bug ID: 1008204
Summary: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org,
pspacek(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com, tbabej(a)redhat.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998522
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998522 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC
FreeIPA with integrated DNS server will support serving of DNSSEC secured
zones.
--- Additional comment from Tomas Babej on 2013-08-28 10:22:11 EDT ---
This feature is self-contained and not in a testable state yet. It is planned
for FreeIPA 3.4 Beta release which is aligned with the F20 schedule.
--- Additional comment from Petr Spacek on 2013-09-02 07:18:58 EDT ---
It is possible that we will not be able to complete the feature in time for
Fedora 20 beta.
From:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC#Contingency_Plan
Contingency mechanism: Do not expose new feature in FreeIPA's user interface
(i.e. revert patches for user interface)
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-09-04 08:28:20 EDT ---
Ok, in case you won't be able to finish it by Beta Change Deadline (currently
planned for 2013-10-08), let me know and put the bug to the NEW state, version
to rawhide.
Thanks for update!
-----------------------------------------------
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001193...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 5 months
[Bug 1008203] New: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008203
Bug ID: 1008203
Summary: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pspacek(a)redhat.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, tbabej(a)redhat.com,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998522
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998522 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC
FreeIPA with integrated DNS server will support serving of DNSSEC secured
zones.
--- Additional comment from Tomas Babej on 2013-08-28 10:22:11 EDT ---
This feature is self-contained and not in a testable state yet. It is planned
for FreeIPA 3.4 Beta release which is aligned with the F20 schedule.
--- Additional comment from Petr Spacek on 2013-09-02 07:18:58 EDT ---
It is possible that we will not be able to complete the feature in time for
Fedora 20 beta.
From:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC#Contingency_Plan
Contingency mechanism: Do not expose new feature in FreeIPA's user interface
(i.e. revert patches for user interface)
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-09-04 08:28:20 EDT ---
Ok, in case you won't be able to finish it by Beta Change Deadline (currently
planned for 2013-10-08), let me know and put the bug to the NEW state, version
to rawhide.
Thanks for update!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Discussion available at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001193...
Please document this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 5 months
[Bug 1107633] New: System-wide crypto policy
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107633
Bug ID: 1107633
Summary: System-wide crypto policy
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: security-guide
Keywords: Documentation, ReleaseNotes
Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com
Reporter: sparks(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: hkario(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
nmavrogi(a)redhat.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com,
security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 1076390
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1076390 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: System-wide crypto policy
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/CryptoPolicy
Unify the crypto policies used by different applications and libraries. That is
allow
setting a consistent security level for crypto on all applications in a Fedora
system. The implementation approach will be to initially modify SSL libraries
to respect the policy and gradually adding more libraries and applications.
--- Additional comment from Eric Christensen on 2014-03-24 13:40:11 EDT ---
I wrote up something about this already (but can't find it) that can be used in
the Release Notes and Security Guide. As soon as I can lay my hands on it,
again, I'll post it for review.
--- Additional comment from Eric Christensen on 2014-03-24 14:40:25 EDT ---
This is the text I'd like to use for the Release Notes and Security Guide if it
looks good to the feature owner.
--- Additional comment from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos on 2014-03-25 05:45:07 EDT
---
Let's not update the release notes and manual yet, as the details are not yet
fixed. I expect these to be fixed by the end of next month.
--- Additional comment from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos on 2014-06-03 07:26:05 EDT
---
I've updated the proposed text for the release notes.
<title>Crypto Policy</title>
<para>Beginning in Fedora 21, a system-wide crypto policy will be available for
users to quickly setup the cryptographic options for their systems. Users that
must meet certain cryptographic standards can make the policy change in
<filename>//etc/crypto-policies/config</filename>, and run
update-crypto-policies. At this point applications that are utilize the default
set of ciphers in the GnuTLS and OpenSSL libraries will follow the policy
requirements.</para>
<para>The available options are: (1) LEGACY, which ensures compatibility with
legacy systems - 64-bit security, (2) DEFAULT, a reasonable default for today's
standards - 80-bit security, and (3) FUTURE, a conservative level that is
believed to withstand any near-term future attacks -128-bit security.
These levels affect SSL/TLS settings, including elliptic curve, signature hash
functions, and ciphersuites and key sizes.</para>
<para>Additional information on this new feature can be found on the <ulink
url="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CryptoPolicy">CryptoPolicy Changes
wiki page</ulink>.</para>
--- Additional comment from Eric Christensen on 2014-06-03 11:58:18 EDT ---
(In reply to Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos from comment #4)
Awesome, thanks! I've added it to the Security Beat
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Security_Beat) and it should be
in the Release Notes for F21.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076390
[Bug 1076390] System-wide crypto policy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 5 months
[Bug 1008575] New: Install Guide Tweaking
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008575
Bug ID: 1008575
Summary: Install Guide Tweaking
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: low
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Please consider corrections for Fedora 20 install guide. The following is my
feedback for F19 Install guide.
Description of problem:
Improvement recommendation for Install Guide.
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/Ins...
Under
1.1. Typographic Conventions
The indented paragraph reads
To see the contents of the file my_next_bestselling_novel in your current
working directory, enter the cat my_next_bestselling_novel command at the shell
prompt and press Enter to execute the command.
I would replace the word "see" with view.
To view the contents of the...
For me, "see" would be the result of issuing the ls command. See the file, view
the contents.
As an aside, for French translation, "to see" translates to "regarder"
whereas view translates to "voir". Il voit le contenu.
Please correct for Fedora 20.
======
Further on the same page...
Warnings should not be ignored. Ignoring warnings will most likely cause data
loss.
My comment.
Warnings do not cause data loss. Warnings advise of a situation that if not
attended to, will most likely cause data loss.
=======
Follow page with Introduction
Introduction
This guide covers installation of Fedora, a Linux distribution built on free
and open source software.
Please change ... built on ... to built with.
My reasoning... You may be on topic, or build on a foundation, but Fedora is
built with free and open source software
=======
Another question. Would you say, "Install Fedora on a computer," or would you
say "Install Fedora onto a computer"? If the latter is more correct, this
fragment is found within the Audience section.
=======
2.1.1. How Do I Download Installation Files?
To follow a Web-based guide to downloading, visit
http://get.fedoraproject.org/. For guidance on which architecture to download,
refer to Section 2.1.2, “Which Architecture Is My Computer?”.
Would the meaning be more clear if the title started with the word "Of" as in
"Of which Architecture Is My Computer?"
(sections 2.1.2 and 2.1.3)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 5 months
[Bug 1069985] New: Release notes should contain changes to kickstart options
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069985
Bug ID: 1069985
Summary: Release notes should contain changes to kickstart
options
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: edgar.hoch(a)ims.uni-stuttgart.de
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
Release notes for Fedora 20 contains nothing about the changes to kickstart
options.
It would be helpful if changes to kickstart options will be noticed in future
release notes too. Now I know that I have to check the wiki diffs of the
Anaconda/Kickstart wiki page to see the changes, but other administrators may
check only the release notes.
An example is the "--addsupport=" option to the "lang" kickstart option which
was added to Fedora 20 (I assume... - I have no information about the time of
the change), together with "%packages ... -instLangs=..." still not
implemented.
Please see also at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051816#c11
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 20 release notes.
How reproducible:
Always.
Another note:
This request is to improve the next release notes.
But I want to note that there should a place (web page, wiki page, etc.) too
where additional (late) informations can be added to release notes of already
released Fedora versions. Is such a place available?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 5 months
[Bug 1060328] New: Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060328
Bug ID: 1060328
Summary: Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no
longer installed
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: toby(a)ovod-everett.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
The Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed (section
2.8.1) during normal installs. It appears, according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Changes/NoDefaultSyslog, that it got moved
from @core to @standard. However, I suspect that a lot of users will do
installs that include @standard, and as a result they will get rsyslog
installed and perhaps be confused as to why they got it when the Release Notes
imply it is no longer included. I can confirm that the
repodata/ac802acf81ab55a0eca1fe5d1222bd15b8fab45d302dfdf4e626716d374b6a64-Fedora-20-comps.xml
file on the x86_64 install DVD contains rsyslog in the @standard package group.
Also, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Changes/NoDefaultSendmail implies
that sendmail got moved from @core to @standard, whereas it appears to me that
it actually got removed from both of them (at least I can't find it anywhere in
the comps.xml file).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 20 x86_64
DVD.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 5 months
[Bug 1063068] New: Wrong distribution mentioned ;)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063068
Bug ID: 1063068
Summary: Wrong distribution mentioned ;)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide
Severity: medium
Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com
Reporter: hetz(a)hetz.biz
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
the page regarding the compatibility mentioning wrong Linux distributin
Here is the page: http://hetz.me/y30lk
As you can see, it mentions "Fedora 6". IMHO it should be Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 6 - as Fedora 6 is dead long time ago ;)
Also, Where can I see the latest version of the doc? or is it always the same
URL as right now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 6 months
[Bug 1001374] New: Web Assets
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001374
Bug ID: 1001374
Summary: Web Assets
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org,
sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com,
tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 997677 (F20WebAssets), 998583
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998583 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Web Assets
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Web_Assets
Traditionally, Fedora has been pushing bits from its various servers to
people's browsers in an ad-hoc fashion, and issues surrounding JavaScript have
been swept under the rug. This change proposal provides a simple framework for
shipping static web content and a way forward to treat JavaScript more closely
to other code in the distribution.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001197...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 7 months
[Bug 1001371] New: Web Assets
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001371
Bug ID: 1001371
Summary: Web Assets
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 997677 (F20WebAssets), 998583
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998583 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Web Assets
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Web_Assets
Traditionally, Fedora has been pushing bits from its various servers to
people's browsers in an ad-hoc fashion, and issues surrounding JavaScript have
been swept under the rug. This change proposal provides a simple framework for
shipping static web content and a way forward to treat JavaScript more closely
to other code in the distribution.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001197...
Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 7 months