[Bug 1050903] New: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Updated Czech translation
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050903
Bug ID: 1050903
Summary: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Updated Czech
translation
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: publishing-requests
Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Please publish an update of the Czech translation of Burning ISO images to disc
guide
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Translation update - missing translation, revision and precision.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 4 months
[Bug 985020] New: explain types of rpm packages (what are they for)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985020
Bug ID: 985020
Summary: explain types of rpm packages (what are they for)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: packager-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bvoperdf21(a)mt2014.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pkovar(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
First I'd like to thank for the awesome documentaions available.
Also +1 for the export function (PDF,html-single,...).
Looking at the packagers guide I missed some information.
It would be nice if you also tell what kind of rpm packages are out there.
What I found so far:
.rpm
.src.rpm
.debugsource....
.debuginfo....
For example I still don't know if the debugsource is needed when using gdb for
debugging or if the debuginfo package is enough.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):Edition 18.0.1
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.go to
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/P...
2.read everything
Actual results: no description of the defferent types of rpm packages
Expected results: find description of the defferent types of rpm packages and
what they are used for/by.
Additional info: would be nice to have this
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 4 months
[Bug 959626] New: config_name mismatch in mock example
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959626
Bug ID: 959626
Summary: config_name mismatch in mock example
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: packager-guide
Severity: low
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: axilleas(a)archlinux.gr
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: fnadge(a)redhat.com
Category: ---
Description of problem:
In section 2.4.3. Testing a Package with Mock, the last example uses the
epel-6-x86_64 config whereas Fedora 18 is referenced above.
According to the preamble, the example should read:
mock -r fedora-18-x86_64 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/eject-2.1.5-0.1.fc18.src.rpm
Link:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 4 months
[Bug 1008227] New: SSD cache
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008227
Bug ID: 1008227
Summary: SSD cache
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: agk(a)redhat.com, i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com,
jeremy(a)goop.org, jreznik(a)redhat.com, kzak(a)redhat.com,
nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, rdieter(a)math.unl.edu,
rolf(a)rolffokkens.nl, sparks(a)redhat.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998543, 999690, 1000817, 1001120, 1003208, 1000078,
1003207
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998543 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: SSD cache
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/SSD_cache
Using recent kernel (3.9 and later) features for (fast) SSD caching of (slow)
ordinary hard disks.
--- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-21 13:35:33 EDT ---
I'll build a bcache-tools RPM and a dm-cache-utils rpm (actually bcache-tools
is already available here: bcache-tools-20130820-0.1.fc19.src.rpm).
I'll follow the procedure as described here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
--- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-24 11:51:34 EDT ---
Tried to create a dmcache-utils package as well (Bug 1000078) but it doesn't
look really useful. So I'll focus on bcache-tools first. For that I still need
a sponsor.
--- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-27 06:52:40 EDT ---
I closed Bug 1000078 since good userland support requires LVM2 to support
dm-cache. Which will happen 'in the future', but F20 doesn't look feasible to
me.
--- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-31 16:21:30 EDT ---
Create Bug 1003207 (bcache support for dracut) which is not blocking for F20,
but probably will be blocking for F21.
--- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-31 16:25:06 EDT ---
Create Bug 1003208 (bcache support for anaconda) which is not blocking for F20,
but probably will be blocking for F21.
--- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-09-09 04:18:18 EDT ---
Test day planned: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/415
--------------------------------------------------------------
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185336.html
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 8 months
[Bug 982899] New: 7.3.1. Establishing a Wired (Ethernet) Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982899
Bug ID: 982899
Summary: 7.3.1. Establishing a Wired (Ethernet) Connection
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In section 7.3.1:
Default connection no longer called 'em1'
No field for 'connection name'
you can add new settings for the network under different profiles by selecting
'add profile...'
you can remove/reset a profile by going to the 'options' button under the
profile and selecting the 'reset' item on the left, and then choosing to either
'reset' or 'forget'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
6 years, 9 months
[Bug 1001344] New: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001344
Bug ID: 1001344
Summary: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org,
sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com,
vgoyal(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998565
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998565 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Kdump_with_secureboot
Currently kexec/kdump is disabled on machines with secureboot enabled. This
feature aims to enable kexec/kdump on such machines.
--- Additional comment from Vivek Goyal on 2013-08-22 10:43:53 EDT ---
I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am not
sure how to do it.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-26 10:28:07 EDT ---
(In reply to Vivek Goyal from comment #1)
> I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am
> not sure how to do it.
Vivek, create Package Review -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process for ima-evm-tools and
block this bug on the created review bug. After review, add it to comps.
Thank you.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001179...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 9 months
[Bug 1001343] New: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001343
Bug ID: 1001343
Summary: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
vgoyal(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998565
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998565 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Kdump_with_secureboot
Currently kexec/kdump is disabled on machines with secureboot enabled. This
feature aims to enable kexec/kdump on such machines.
--- Additional comment from Vivek Goyal on 2013-08-22 10:43:53 EDT ---
I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am not
sure how to do it.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-26 10:28:07 EDT ---
(In reply to Vivek Goyal from comment #1)
> I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am
> not sure how to do it.
Vivek, create Package Review -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process for ima-evm-tools and
block this bug on the created review bug. After review, add it to comps.
Thank you.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001179...
Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 9 months
[Bug 977042] New: GUI examples presume GNOME without stating it is GNOME
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977042
Bug ID: 977042
Summary: GUI examples presume GNOME without stating it is GNOME
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
The System Administrator's Guide references a number of GUI utilities, many of
which are specific to GNOME. It isn't immediately obvious to the uninitiated
that this is the case, causing non-GNOME users to find fault with the guide.
I suggest an admonition in the preface along the lines of "Some of the
graphical procedures and menu locations are specific to GNOME, but most command
line instructions will be universally applicable" Comprehensively
differentiating between GNOME procedures, procedures for other DEs, and
universal procedures would probably be prohibitively time consuming.
--Pete
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 9 months