[Bug 982906] New: 7.3.2. Establishing a Wireless Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982906
Bug ID: 982906
Summary: 7.3.2. Establishing a Wireless Connection
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Section 7.3.2 under the heading:
'Saving Your New (or Modified) Connection and Making Further Configurations'
it states:
"You can further configure an existing connection by selecting it in the
Network Connections window and clicking Edit to return to the Editing dialog."
This could be clarified by stating that network connections can be found under:
activities --> applications --> sundry --> network connections
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 6 months
[Bug 979158] New: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens windows when you hot add virtio drives
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979158
Bug ID: 979158
Summary: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens
windows when you hot add virtio drives
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: virtualization-deployment-guide
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: lbailey(a)redhat.com
Reporter: robert.rupert(a)servicemesh.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: lbailey(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Windows Blue Screens in KVM when using the latest virtio driver 1-59. When hot
adding scsi drive
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
fresh install with virtio scsi driver 1-59,=. Then hot add virtio scsi driver
in windows 7, 2008r2 and 2012
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
using the previose version 1-52 works fine
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 999762] New: Java FAQ
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999762
Bug ID: 999762
Summary: Java FAQ
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: low
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: pcsnow(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem: Parts of Java FAQ may need some updates.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/FAQ?rd=JavaFAQ
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):19
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
1. JPackage does not seem updated since 2009
2. Intelllij complains that non-sun version has performance problems during
install and recommends against use of OpenJDK.
3. It might be helpful to provide some assistance in docs to allow easy
integration of Oracle Java using system-switch-java.
The FAQ does not mention switch-java as an option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 9 months
[Bug 1001342] New: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001342
Bug ID: 1001342
Summary: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org,
pmachata(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 991875, 991877, 991878, 991879, 991882, 991883,
991919, 998564
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998564 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/F20Boost154
This change brings Boost 1.54.0 to Fedora 20.
--- Additional comment from Petr Machata on 2013-08-19 11:30:25 EDT ---
Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two
weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin,
iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars).
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-20 08:57:28 EDT ---
(In reply to Petr Machata from comment #1)
> Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two
> weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin,
> iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars).
Could you please set blocks/depends on for broken boost deps (if bug exists?).
Thanks.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001169...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 10 months
[Bug 1001341] New: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001341
Bug ID: 1001341
Summary: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pmachata(a)redhat.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 991875, 991877, 991878, 991879, 991882, 991883,
991919, 998564
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998564 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/F20Boost154
This change brings Boost 1.54.0 to Fedora 20.
--- Additional comment from Petr Machata on 2013-08-19 11:30:25 EDT ---
Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two
weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin,
iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars).
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-20 08:57:28 EDT ---
(In reply to Petr Machata from comment #1)
> Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two
> weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin,
> iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars).
Could you please set blocks/depends on for broken boost deps (if bug exists?).
Thanks.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001169...
Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 10 months
[Bug 846864] New: Need a list of toolsets and when they are appropriate in the virt Getting Started guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846864
Bug ID: 846864
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: devel
Priority: unspecified
CC: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Assignee: laine(a)redhat.com
Summary: Need a list of toolsets and when they are appropriate
in the virt Getting Started guide
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: laine(a)redhat.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide
Product: Fedora Documentation
The Getting Started Guide needs an overview of all the different toolsets, and
when each would be appropriate. In particular I'm talking about the following:
1) gnome-boxes
2) virt-manager
3) virsh, virt-install
4) ovirt
5) Should we point some people to OpenStack?
I will write up a first draft of this, and hand it to a qualified docs person
to edit and correctly place in the guide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 10 months