[Bug 857729] New: Build errors out due to missing Package_Selection-dvd.xml file.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857729
Bug ID: 857729
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Severity: high
Version: devel
Priority: unspecified
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Assignee: rlandman(a)redhat.com
Summary: Build errors out due to missing
Package_Selection-dvd.xml file.
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: joat(a)757.org
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: installation-quick-start-guide
Product: Fedora Documentation
Description of problem:
Publican issues the following error when trying to build the Installation Quick
Start Guide:
FATAL ERROR: XInclude:1604 in Installation_Quick_Start_Guide.xml on line 37:
could not load Package_Selection-dvd.xml, and no fallback was found
Verified that Package_Selection-dvd.xml does not exist in en-US/.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible: consistent
Steps to Reproduce:
1. mkdir projects
2. cd projects
3. git clone
git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/docs/installation-quick-start-guide.git
4. cd installation-quick-start-guide
5. publican build --langs=en-US --formats=html
Same error is emitted for --formats=pdf
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 7 months
[Bug 976101] New: typo in Security Guide 3.9.3 - should be /sbin/service iptables
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976101
Bug ID: 976101
Summary: typo in Security Guide 3.9.3 - should be /sbin/service
iptables
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: security-guide
Severity: low
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bugredhat(a)halfgoat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com,
security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
typo in Security Guide section 3.9.3 - incorrect in final Note "(/sbin/iptables
service)" should be "(/sbin/service iptables)"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 18
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Read section 3.9.3
2.
3.
Actual results:
(/sbin/iptables service)
Expected results:
(/sbin/service iptables)
Additional info:
It is correct elsewhere on the page.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 7 months
[Bug 836383] New:=?UTF-8?Q?=20Merging=20teams=20and=E2=80=A6=20zanata=20or=20TXN?=?!
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836383
Bug ID: 836383
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Severity: high
Version: devel
Priority: unspecified
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Assignee: rlandman(a)redhat.com
Summary: Merging teams and… zanata or TXN?!
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: installation-quick-start-guide
Product: Fedora Documentation
Hi,
I am a maintainer of this guide at TXN, but before doing the full merge, i
wanted to be sure…
https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/fedora-ins-quick-start-guide/
* fb03c3c Adding zanata config file
I can see some zanata things.
You serious guys, you are moving to zanata?
If so…
* Please *MERGE* before.
* Also, be notified that you won't benefit of any Fedora translators. Only RH
folks are there… That's not good, we use a unified platform, already spreading
translators between teams… having many platform is going to be a pain.
* delete the transifex one. And prevent us, translators…
If the project stay at TXN, why it does not have any .tx/config file? (or no
lang_map?)
Could I help?
Thanks,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 8 months
[Bug 970468] New: Inconsistent expression in Development section of Fedora 19 release notes
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970468
Bug ID: 970468
Summary: Inconsistent expression in Development section of
Fedora 19 release notes
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: tiansworld(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Description of problem:
Under Development section,
There is a paragraph:
Python programmers who use the xml ...
<package>PyXML</package> replaced the <function>stdlib</function> code with its
own ... code and unmaintained upstream.
I think what the sentence "<package>PyXML</package> replaced the
<function>stdlib</function> code with its own" expressing is wrong and
inconsistent with previous statement.
<package>PyXML</package> is replaced, not <function>stdlib</function>.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 19 beta
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
It should be changed.
For example, change it to:
<function>stdlib</function> replaced the <package>PyXML</package> code with its
own.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 9 months
[Bug 977771] New: System_Daemons: Should "/var/run/journal is volatile" be in the past tense?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977771
Bug ID: 977771
Summary: System_Daemons: Should "/var/run/journal is volatile"
be in the past tense?
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: jmatsuzawa(a)gnome.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Description of problem:
In the following sentence:
"In previous releases, journal data was stored in
<filename>/var/run/journal</filename>, which is volatile and cleared on
reboot."
Should "which is volatile..." be written in the past tense? Does it mean "which
was volatile..."?
I'm sorry if I misunderstand the sentence.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
F19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 9 months
[Bug 973173] New: Typo in Desktop.xml for F19
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973173
Bug ID: 973173
Summary: Typo in Desktop.xml for F19
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: jmatsuzawa(a)gnome.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Created attachment 759599
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=759599&action=edit
Fix typo
Description of problem:
Desktop.xml for F19 has a typo. Look at the following diff (the patch is
attached):
diff --git a/en-US/Desktop.xml b/en-US/Desktop.xml
index 9bd23e1..99bf5d7 100644
--- a/en-US/Desktop.xml
+++ b/en-US/Desktop.xml
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
The latest release of the popular desktop environment
<productname>Cinnamon</productname> brings new features and polish to Fedora
&PRODVER;, including:
<simplelist>
<member>
- <emphasis>nemo</emphasis>, the file manager, has been heavily
modified to itegrate it's behavior with Cinnamon.
+ <emphasis>nemo</emphasis>, the file manager, has been heavily
modified to itegrate its behavior with Cinnamon.
</member>
<member>
<emphasis>screensaver</emphasis> has been improved, including a lock
screen with customizable away message.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 9 months