[Bug 822857] New: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822857
Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: unspecified
Component: readme-burning-isos
AssignedTo: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com
QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: stickster(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Once again, please merge the'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'.
And then delete the fr_FR one.
fr_FR is not the only duplicated team.
See #816765
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
11 years, 1 month
[Bug 822855] New: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822855
Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: unspecified
Component: virtualization-guide
AssignedTo: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com
QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Once again, please merge the'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'.
And then delete the fr_FR one.
fr_FR is not the only duplicated team.
See #816765
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
11 years, 1 month
[Bug 822859] New: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822859
Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: unspecified
Component: accessibility-guide
AssignedTo: mail.gerardryan(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com
QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: eric(a)christensenplace.us, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Once again, please merge the'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'.
And then delete the fr_FR one.
fr_FR is not the only duplicated team.
See #816765
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
11 years, 1 month
[Bug 912563] New: Instructions faulty and/or lackng regarding validation of ISO's from a Windows 7 platform
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912563
Bug ID: 912563
Summary: Instructions faulty and/or lackng regarding validation
of ISO's from a Windows 7 platform
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: readme-burning-isos
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: j.moorhouse(a)zoomtown.com
Created attachment 699286
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=699286&action=edit
Attachment 3 (the other 2 weren't allowed); 3 attempts at Command Prompt
Description of problem: First, you assume that the CHECKSUM file is readily
available; it isn't. It can be found by clicking the proper link from
https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify . In "Burning ISO Images to disc" 3.1 you
suggest 3 free tools to check the hashes in a Windows Graphical Environment;
none work. HashTab (att 1) doesn't cover the SHA256 algorithm, the web site for
the Marxio File Checksum Verifier couldn't be accessed, snd the DiviHasher (att
2) worked fine except that the length of the calculated hash exceeded the space
available. In 3.2 (att 3), we are trying the Command Line. The first attempt
does it just like the manual; it failed. The second assumed that by "Owner" in
the manual example you meant to substitute the actual name of the owner; it too
failed. The third attempt does the directory change in one operation and the
hash calculation in another, because that works; doing them both in the same
contiguous operation doesn't.
Incidentally, Windows no longer uses those cuddly little "My Whatever"
expressions.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible: Very!! I spent over a week fighting this!
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Just follow the printed directions exactly
2.
3.
Actual results:
See attachments
Expected results:
Calculation of a valid checksum
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
11 years, 1 month
[Bug 879745] New: 18.5. Setting a FreeIPA Server as an Apache Virtual Host causes systax errors
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879745
Bug ID: 879745
Summary: 18.5. Setting a FreeIPA Server as an Apache Virtual
Host causes systax errors
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: freeipa-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: deanhunter(a)comcast.net
Description of problem:
Following the instructions in Section 18.5. Setting a FreeIPA Server as an
Apache Virtual Host of the FreeIPA Guide results in systax errors in the Apache
configuration.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 17 FreeIPA Guide
freeipa-server.x86_64 2.2.1-2.fc17
How reproducible:
consistently
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Follow the instructions to modify ipa.conf
2. apachectl configtest
Actual results:
WSGISocketPrefix cannot occur within <VirtualHost> section
KrbConstrainedDelegationLock cannot occur within <VirtualHost> section
Expected results:
Syntax OK
Additional info:
I am trying to server user content from the Apache server installed with
FreeIPA. I thought if I configured the IPA server into a virtual host I could
create additional virtual hosts for user content without conflict.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
11 years, 2 months
[Bug 848546] New: ipa-install-server used instead of ipa-server-install
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848546
Bug ID: 848546
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: devel
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: dlackey(a)redhat.com
Summary: ipa-install-server used instead of ipa-server-install
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: rmeggins(a)redhat.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: freeipa-guide
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/FreeIPA_Guide/creatin...
"The FreeIPA setup process can be minimal, where the administrator only
supplies some required information, or it can be very specific, with
user-defined settings for many parts of the FreeIPA services. The configuration
is passed using arguments with the ipa-install-server script."
This should say ipa-server-install
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
11 years, 2 months
[Bug 907627] New: Some suggested grammatical corrections
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907627
Bug ID: 907627
Summary: Some suggested grammatical corrections
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: uefi-secure-boot-guide
Severity: low
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: dram1964(a)gmail.com
Just read the draft version 18.2.2 and would like to offer the following
corrections for consideration:
Preface: Section 1.1
Replace:
Key combinations can be distinguished from keycaps by the hyphen connecting
each part
With:
Key combinations can be distinguished from keycaps by the plus sign (+)
connecting each part
Chapter 1:
Perhaps an explanation of what UEFI stands for would be useful in the
introduction?
Chapter 1: Section 1.1
Replace:
We can be certain that no unsigned executable code is present until the initial
ramdisk (initrd) is loaded
With:
Secure Boot ensures that no unsigned executable code is present until the
initial ramdisk (initrd) is loaded
Chapter 1: Section 1.2
Replace:
In Fedora if you use Secure Boot, what modules the kernel loads can be
restricted, but user space malware cannot.
With:
Secure Boot in Fedora allows you to restrict modules loaded by the kernel: but
it does not allow you to control malware loaded in user space.
Chapter 2: Section 2.1
Replace:
The solution to use the Microsoft signing service was one of simplicity
With:
The option to use the Microsoft signing service was provided for simplicity
Chapter 2: Section 2.2
Typo:
Thie blacklist is a file
Correction:
The blacklist is a file
Replace:
Microsoft will provide this list to Fedora Project
With:
Microsoft will provide this list to the Fedora Project
Replace:
Microsoft has stated that the blacklist is to be used to prevent binaries being
used for attacks from executing.
With:
Microsoft has stated that the blacklist is to be used to prevent binaries being
used to execute attacks.
Replace:
We are working to limit the impacts of this
With:
We are working to limit the impact of this
Chapter 2: Section 2.3
Replace:
In future iterations of Secure Boot support the above may also be possible
With:
In future iterations of Secure Boot support for the above may also be possible
regards
Dave R
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
11 years, 2 months
[Bug 910745] New: pesign does not include sbsetup
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910745
Bug ID: 910745
Summary: pesign does not include sbsetup
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: uefi-secure-boot-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: fweimer(a)redhat.com
The tool mention in the section on pesign is not part of the Fedora package.
We need to find out if we ship comparable code somewhere else and document how
to use that to enable UEFI Secure Boot (including Microsoft's mode of
operation).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
11 years, 2 months
[Bug 830870] still references to F12 and F13
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830870
Pete Travis <me(a)petetravis.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dew(a)donaldwinslow.info
--- Comment #2 from Pete Travis <me(a)petetravis.com> ---
*** Bug 881562 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
11 years, 2 months