[Bug 982504] New: 4.2. Using the User Accounts Tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982504
Bug ID: 982504
Summary: 4.2. Using the User Accounts Tool
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
section 4.2 Using the User Accounts Tool
related to bug 982500
location of the settings dialog is:
activities --> applications --> utilities --> settings
Further:
The 'User Accounts' tool is called 'Users' in Gnome 3.8.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 1 month
[Bug 982444] New: 1.1 - region and language
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982444
Bug ID: 982444
Summary: 1.1 - region and language
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Sys admin guide information regarding region and language doesn't specify which
desktop environment is assumed to find the region and language. Also to find
region and language in KDE, you click on the applications launcher, go to
applications --> settings --> system settings, but it's also set as a favourite
by default in F19 so can be found under favourites. Also in KDE, under system
settings, the 'region and language' settings are under 'locale',
'country/region and language'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 1 month
[Bug 982500] New: 2.1 Using the Date and Time Configuration Tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982500
Bug ID: 982500
Summary: 2.1 Using the Date and Time Configuration Tool
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Gnome settings menu location has changed in 3.8.3:
Activities --> Applications --> Utilities --> Settings
This is not reflected in section 2.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 1 month
[Bug 1018500] New: There's no section in the documentation for NFS, after Fedora 14
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018500
Bug ID: 1018500
Summary: There's no section in the documentation for NFS, after
Fedora 14
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: storage-administration-guide
Assignee: ddomingo(a)redhat.com
Reporter: david.jones74(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
There's no section in the documentation for current Fedora versions, about how
to configure NFS. There's SAMBA and FTP, but no NFS.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Search or browse documentation.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Can find scattered information about configuring NFS, but no consolidated
section.
Expected results:
Section for configuring NFS clients and servers.
Additional info:
There are many changes in NFS configuration since Fedora 14. There's a
different init system with different service names, There's also a new firewall
manager. I'm just guess at a lot of the details, and it's pretty frustrating.
Why does SAMBA have a large detailed section, and NFS has nothing? This is
Linux, right? Is the Fedora Project moving to SAMBA as the preferred file
sharing method?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 2 months
[Bug 1008149] New: Contraficting info about the need of shared storage for storing guest images to be migrated
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008149
Bug ID: 1008149
Summary: Contraficting info about the need of shared storage
for storing guest images to be migrated
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide
Assignee: dayleparker(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jrodrigosm(a)yahoo.es
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: dayleparker(a)redhat.com, docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
In the Fedora 19 "Virtualization Getting Started Guide", section 2.2 ("What is
migration?"), URL
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Virtualization_Getting...
In the paragraph right before the 2.2.1 title, it is stated that "In Fedora 19,
shared storage is not necessary for storing guest images to be migrated. With
live storage migration [...]".
But in the last paragraph of the page, right before the note, it is stated that
"Shared, networked storage must be used for storing guest images to be
migrated. Without shared storage, migration is not possible."
These two statements seem contradictory to me. I just started learning about
virtualization, so I am unable to propose an alternative. But I do think some
clarification is needed.
Thanks,
Rodrigo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 6 months
[Bug 982906] New: 7.3.2. Establishing a Wireless Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982906
Bug ID: 982906
Summary: 7.3.2. Establishing a Wireless Connection
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Section 7.3.2 under the heading:
'Saving Your New (or Modified) Connection and Making Further Configurations'
it states:
"You can further configure an existing connection by selecting it in the
Network Connections window and clicking Edit to return to the Editing dialog."
This could be clarified by stating that network connections can be found under:
activities --> applications --> sundry --> network connections
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 979158] New: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens windows when you hot add virtio drives
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979158
Bug ID: 979158
Summary: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens
windows when you hot add virtio drives
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: virtualization-deployment-guide
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: lbailey(a)redhat.com
Reporter: robert.rupert(a)servicemesh.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: lbailey(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Windows Blue Screens in KVM when using the latest virtio driver 1-59. When hot
adding scsi drive
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
fresh install with virtio scsi driver 1-59,=. Then hot add virtio scsi driver
in windows 7, 2008r2 and 2012
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
using the previose version 1-52 works fine
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 999762] New: Java FAQ
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999762
Bug ID: 999762
Summary: Java FAQ
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: low
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: pcsnow(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem: Parts of Java FAQ may need some updates.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/FAQ?rd=JavaFAQ
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):19
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
1. JPackage does not seem updated since 2009
2. Intelllij complains that non-sun version has performance problems during
install and recommends against use of OpenJDK.
3. It might be helpful to provide some assistance in docs to allow easy
integration of Oracle Java using system-switch-java.
The FAQ does not mention switch-java as an option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 10 months
[Bug 1001341] New: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001341
Bug ID: 1001341
Summary: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pmachata(a)redhat.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 991875, 991877, 991878, 991879, 991882, 991883,
991919, 998564
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998564 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/F20Boost154
This change brings Boost 1.54.0 to Fedora 20.
--- Additional comment from Petr Machata on 2013-08-19 11:30:25 EDT ---
Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two
weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin,
iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars).
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-20 08:57:28 EDT ---
(In reply to Petr Machata from comment #1)
> Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two
> weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin,
> iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars).
Could you please set blocks/depends on for broken boost deps (if bug exists?).
Thanks.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001169...
Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 10 months