On Tue, 01 Oct 2013, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On 09/27/2013 09:29 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 08:46 AM, Junliang Li wrote:
>> Fedora 19 has a tool named rasdaemon. From its maintainer, Mauro, I know
>> that rasdaemon and ABRT will work together. But I don't know much about
>> that. Would anyone introduce something about rasdaemon and ABRT?
>
> Denys is responsible for rasdaemon&ABRT integration, so I'm adding him to
the loop.
IIUC rasdaemon does not send its data yet to abrt.
rasdaemon developers work on the way to prevent
floods of error reports: it's semi-trivial to generate
a single report about an isolated ECC error on PCIe bus;
but what if there are thousands of them per second?
We (abrt team) provided documentation necessary
to use abrt's "create problem data" API.
We are ready to aid rasdaemon people if they have
questions or proposals for changes in abrt.
Some of them (Petr Holasek) are colocated with
abrt team and can just walk over and talk with us.
Hello all,
to be honest, I still can't find time for digging into implementation of abrt
hook for rasdaemon as well as we still wait for Intel guys who implement code
for reducing floods of errors in some reasonable manner. So I've created RFE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013567 that can be taken by
somebody interested in it.
However, I'd be happy to help on rasdaemon side, main idea is to create more
generic output interface, not only console output and DB.
regards,
Petr