Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> writes:
Looks ok to me.
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 03:49:22PM +0200, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
> + char *not_reportalbe_reason = dd_load_text_ext(dd, FILENAME_NOT_REPORTABLE, 0
^^- typo :)
duh! :)
> + "Kernel
maintainers are not interesting about "
> + "tainted kernel, because the trace not
showing "
> + "the root problem."
Is this always the case? Perhaps it would be more correct to say
"might not be showing"?
maybe not always. I'm not the kernel guy, but maybe there is possibility
that you can have tainted kernel and useful trace. I'll change it.
--
Save the whales. Feed the hungry. Free the mallocs