Thanks to both of you. Could we get the tests onto the Packager Dashboard?
I can file a pr at
,
or co-sign one if someone else wants to. :)
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 4:14 AM Miroslav Vadkerti <mvadkert(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Thanks Miro,
The false positives come from the fact that we gathered the requests data
of Testing Farm, a final check
to check if that corresponds with the current state would get rid of those
false positives.
I will not more spend now more time on it, I believe it is only a few
occasions.
But thanks for taking the time and looking into it.
Best regards,
/M
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 1:02 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 25. 08. 22 19:46, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > I wanted to follow up on this question you had on DevConf.US 22 [1].
> >
> > We would like to make these stats available to the community,
> unfortunately now
> > it is just a DB query to our Testing Farm database.
> >
> > So, currently that is: 449 packages
> >
> > I am attaching lists for proof.
>
>
> I recognize some false positives in the list:
>
>
> >
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros
> >
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pypy
> >
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-packaging
>
> The packages use STI, not TMT.
>
>
>
> >
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pypy3
>
> This package is retired on all branches, cannot use anything, used STI
> before,
> not TMT.
>
>
> >
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-dotenv
> >
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-requests
> >
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-shellingham
> >
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-urllib3
>
> The TMT tests were removed ~1 year ago.
>
>
>
> There might be more such cases, I only checked a handful of packages I
> know or
> co-maintain.
>
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok
>
>
--
Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE
IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252
Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o