On 05/28/2010 01:38 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> >
>> >> We also need to hack the emma code inside of buildr to not try and
>> >> download emma from a remote repository.
>> >>
> > Adam, is this change still necessary?
> >
I think so. Emma downloads from a different repo definition, and that
would violate both the mead and the jpackage approaches.
Can we make it so that
emma is not run as part of the normal build? I
would like it on in the continuous build, but does not need to be on as
part of brew.
-- bk