On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:51:05 +0000 James Laska
<jlaska(a)redhat.com> wrote:
CC +jhutar for rpmfluff comments below ...
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 08:03 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm happy to announce that in the git there is a
> kparal/rpmguard-integration branch available containing my
> latest effort to bring rpmguard to autoqa. I would be glad
> for any feedback provided. If you want to see it in action
> easily, you can run e.g. this command:
>
> $ autoqa post-koji-build --name ctdb --kojitag
> dist-f12-updates-candidate --arch x86_64 --arch i686
> ctdb-1.0.108-1.fc12 -t rpmguard (append --local if you have
> only autotest-client installed)
>
> That should be working until ctdb gets the update-candidate
> tag off. Example output is here:
>
http://pastebin.com/m73c45d08
>
> I have some concerns about current implementation, what
> should be improved and when the test could fail, but I'll
> cover that in some further emails.
>
> What about the output format, Will? Should something be
> changed?
Another nice thing about your branch is the built-in test code
'rpmguard_test.py'. I noticed that it relies on rpmfluff [1]
which isn't packaged yet.
Anyone interested in packaging rpmfluff for Fedora?
Thanks,
James
[1]
https://fedorahosted.org/rpmfluff/
Hello,
I have rpmfluff packaged in:
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/r/p/rpmfluff/
and if you want, I can start with getting it into the Fedora.
Should I?
Regards,
Jan
--
Jan Hutar Systems Management QA
jhutar(a)redhat.com Red Hat, Inc.