On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 18:17 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
On 07/29/2014 08:42 AM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 15:40 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
>> We use zRAM devices as swaps so they should be protected and hidden from the
>> user.
> Forgot to mention that I don't understand why only removable protected
> devices were hidden. If anybody has a clue, please share that wisdom.
>
An internal disk can be the install source and the user may still want
to format and/or mount partitions from that disk. We only hide drives
that are both removable and protected because they presumably have no
business playing a permanent role in the post-install system.
There have been some
complaints (and maybe even a bug report) that we
allow installation to the same disk as the one used as an installation
source.
But even if we want to allow that, I think only the partition with that
install source should be protected, not the whole disk. So that looks
like a bug somewhere else to me.
--
Vratislav Podzimek
Anaconda Rider | RHCE | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic