On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 06:17 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:58:18AM +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> This and the patches 2/4 and 3/4 looks good to me except that I don't
> see any relation between this patch and rhbz#868707. Wrong number?
Nope. What would happen is if you didn't setup a suitable stage1 device
(eg. UEFI without an EFI System Partition) the errors would get
clobbered and the install would be allowed to continue. You'd then hit
the traceback in the bug. The additional check in completed was added
for good measure, but isn't part of this bug.
Thanks for the explanation.
--
Vratislav Podzimek
Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic