On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 04:55:05PM +1000, Justin Clift wrote:
On 06/09/2011, at 1:20 PM, Robert Terhaar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As I just stated in my previous email, I'm a new Aeolus user.
>
> What is the Aeolus project (and various components) licensed under? I see a ASLv2
notice on some components, but many of them lack a license file that I'm able to
find.
It's kind of a mix presently. There's an outstanding ToDo item to finish off a
discussion from ages ago about whether ASLv2 would be best for all projects or not (except
Image Warehouse due to dependencies).
>From memory, most things are ASLv2 now, though some things aren't. Looking at Oz
for example, it has a LGPL 2.1 license file in it.
I'd really like to go ahead and get everything moved to ASLv2 if no
one has any objections. Justin I think if you would take care of the
patches to add/change that licence, we could get them acked and pushed
in short order.
--Hugh
--
== Hugh Brock, hbrock(a)redhat.com ==
== Engineering Manager, Cloud BU ==
== Aeolus Project: Manage virtual infrastructure across clouds. ==
==
http://aeolusproject.org ==
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m
not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
--Robert McCloskey