From a user experience standpoint, you're fine here. If everything else is in "<object> user" format, those should be too, unless there's a technical reason (which would be more than a little weird).
I think it's a bit odd, overall, to have the "user" suffix appended to every role name -- isn't it apparent in the UI which user you're connecting with which role, or must there be redundancy?
-- Kenneth Keiter Sr. Software Engineer, Cloud BU kenkeiter@redhat.com http://twitter.com/kenkeiter IRC: tigger or tiggerer
On Feb 20, 2012, at 2:50 PM, Jason Guiditta wrote:
Hello list, I was just looking at seeds.rb to see about extracting our role names into i18n files so we can leverage the configuration I added there last week, and noticed what seems to me to be a minor inconsistency. Disregarding role with the name 'Administrator', it seems most of our roles are named: "{object name} user" or "{object name} owner"
There are 2 exceptions I see to this - the Instance and Deployment objects. These both use 'Controller' instead of 'User'.
I would like to propose making those consistent as part of the patch I am working on, unless there is some reason they are like this of which I am unaware. Thoughts?
-j