Thanks
Alberto Viana
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 12/13/2013 10:43 AM, Alberto Viana wrote:
Rich,
The behavior is a little bit different and I will try to explain:
version: 389-Directory/1.2.11.25 B2013.347.1221
389DS <--> Windows 2008 R2
Name of group: GSG_TESTE
Included a lot of users on this group, including this user:
DN of the user on windows: CN=Alberto Viana,OU=TESTE,DC=homolog,DC=rnp
DN of the user on 389DS: uid=alberto.viana,ou=TESTE,dc=homolog,dc=rnp
What I did:
Changeg the OU of the user via windows to:
NEW DN: CN=Alberto Viana,OU=NEW,DC=homolog,DC=rnp
What happenned:
Did not deleted all users from the group.
389DS moved correctly the user to new DN:
uid=alberto.viana,ou=NEW,dc=homolog,dc=rnp
389DS Added this new uid (uid=alberto.viana,ou=NEW,dc=homolog,dc=rnp) to
group, but keep the old entry too
(uid=alberto.viana,ou=TESTE,dc=homolog,dc=rnp).
Whe I remove the old entry manually
(uid=alberto.viana,ou=TESTE,dc=homolog,dc=rnp) from the group, 389 DS
deletes all users from the group on both sides (389DS and windows)
Do need any specific information? should I file a ticket?
Yes.
I also have a third 389DS running version 1.3.2.6 with a similar
behavior to 1.2.10.12 (as I described in my first email)
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com>wrote:
> On 12/12/2013 12:15 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
>
> Rich,
>
> but in my case, the new OU is not ou of my scope. The sync deleted all
> of my users from my group (I think that I didnt make myself clear enough
> and you thought that users were deleted from 389DS) on both sides and just
> keep the user that I changed from windows side.
>
> So just make sure that you can undestand my problem. I Have a group
> named GRP_TEST and in this group i have a lot of users. When I change the
> OU of one of theses users, the sync delete all users from this group oh
> both sides (windows and 389DS) and just keep the user that I modified the
> OU.
>
> Am I clear enough?
>
>
> Yes. If you can reproduce the issue with 1.2.11, please file a ticket.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> On 12/12/2013 11:55 AM, Alberto Viana wrote:
>>
>> I found the root cause, it's happens when I change a user from one OU to
>> another on my windows side.
>>
>> Is that an expected behavior?
>>
>> sounds like
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/355
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Alberto Viana
<albertocrj(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I have 2 389 DS with multimaster replicaton and one of them replicating
>>> (multimaster) with my AD server
>>>
>>> 389DS2 <--> 389DS1 <--> ADServer
>>>
>>> 389-Directory/1.2.10.12
>>> AD Server 2008 R2
>>>
>>>
>>> With 2 specific groups, for some reason that could not identify in my
>>> logs, all members are deleted (i'm not sure if the root cause is the
389DS
>>> or my AD).
>>>
>>> Can someone take a look on my log file and point me what is going on?
>>>
>>> I dont want to send my log to the list because that a lot of
>>> information of my users. Can I send direct to someone?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing
list389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orghttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing
list389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orghttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
>
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
--
389 users mailing
list389-users@lists.fedoraproject.orghttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users