W dniu 03.02.2011 17:42, Gerrard Geldenhuis pisze:
Hi Daniel,
I am getting 1200 conn/sec on very old hardware so maybe something else is wrong.
The very first thing to do is to run logconv.pl script which will come installed with
389. It has a flag for recommendations which I suggest you enable or just enable every
flag.
Sample command:
logconv.pl /var/log/dirsrv/slapd-<hostname>/access -efcibaltnxrgjyp
I don't yet understand all the errors that this tool reports but it is a good start.
One other thing, I disabled log buffering at one stage to debug something. I forgot about
this and then ended up debugging why the server was so slow until I realized that is what
I had done. So make sure you have logbuffering enabled.
dn: cn=config
changetype: modify
replace: nsslapd-accesslog-logbuffering
nsslapd-accesslog-logbuffering: on
I've buffered logs, there's no problem with IO (below).
Are you sure that you have 1200 tcp connections/s to LDAP server? If
you've not mistaken connections/s with binds/s, then please tell me
what have you done to get this result?
# vmstat 5
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system--
-----cpu------
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy
id wa st
.....
2 0 105388 15396 28320 6051316 0 0 10 573 5685 7408 24
4 72 0 0
2 0 105388 16012 28312 6050872 0 0 1 718 5891 7812 25
4 72 0 0
1 0 105388 16276 28328 6050336 0 0 8 662 5773 7518 24
4 72 0 0
4 0 105388 16464 28308 6050100 0 0 2 546 5577 7392 24
4 72 0 0
4 0 105388 15424 28324 6051228 0 0 6 665 5724 7480 23
4 73 0 0
Regards
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 389-users-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-
> bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Fenert
> Sent: 03 February 2011 16:30
> To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
> Subject: [389-users] Performance tuning - where to begin?
>
> Hi,
>
> I have performance problem on 389-ds server and don't really know where
> to start fine tuning.
>
> My current setup is master (2xQuadCore, 8GB RAM), few read-only slaves.
> It works (more or less) without problems, but I would like to migrate to
> multi master (2 master servers).
>
> To check if one master will handle the whole load, I've tried switching
> clients from slaves to master one by one.
>
> After switching clients from third slave, I've encountered weird problem
> - master was about 50% busy (looking at the cpu, no IO waits), but there was
> problem with new connections.
> Looking at the network level - there was SYN from client, but no ACK until
> one or two retransmissions of SYN.
>
> I've tried increasing thread number (from 30 to 60), but problem still exists.
>
> The problem is near 400-500 connections/second. My whole load is
> ~750conn/sec. Looking at the CPU usage, this server should handle the load.
> It works stable with load ~300conn/sec.
>
> There are plenty of configuration options, where should I look first?
>
> --
> Daniel Fenert
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
________________________________________________________________________
In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair Group use SkyScan from
MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses.
________________________________________________________________________
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users