Hi Morgan,
in our case we have ~60 000 entries, ~10 000 accounts and ~5 000 large groups (some containing almost all users). Three 389ds in active-active replication, extremely stable, performant, no problems at all. We are using RHEL 9 clones (Oracle Linux or Alma Linux), latest OS patches (9.4 i think). 389ds version 2.5 compiling from git branch (i think the latest one is 2.5.1, maybe it is available as rpm). No complaints at all :)
Regards,
AI
----- Mail original -----
De: "Morgan Jones" À: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server, project." 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Envoyé: Mercredi 5 Juin 2024 22:25:14 Objet: [389-users] advice on 389 in production
Hello Everyone,
What operating system and 389 version is everyone running in production? We are finally updating our CentOS 7 servers in earnest.
We have almost 200,000 users and use 389 for our central ldap so stability is preferred over features.
Based on release dates I'm leaning toward version 2.x.
I've sent the afternoon trying to find packages for Rocky Linux 9 with limited success.
We switched to Ubuntu a few years ago so that would be my preference but I don't see packages for ubuntu and I'd prefer to now maintain my own packages.
Is Docker a viable option for a production install? I see there is an up to date image which I've been able to start but it appears to be 3.x (see above re: preferred production version).
Thanks,
-morgan
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.... Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue