Change in vdsm[master]: build: Change dependency on glusterfs-cli and glusterfs-fuse

nsoffer at redhat.com nsoffer at redhat.com
Wed Jul 1 20:44:56 UTC 2015


Nir Soffer has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: build: Change dependency on glusterfs-cli and glusterfs-fuse
......................................................................


Patch Set 3:

(1 comment)

https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/43097/3//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

Line 13: info api to implement mounting gluster backup servers
Line 14: (https://gerrit.ovirt.org/41858).
Line 15: However, requiring these dependencies fails vdsm build on ppc64le.
Line 16: This patch revert requiring glusterfs-cli and glusterfs-fuse
Line 17: dependencies as were originally defined.
Please describe the result of this patch - what will happen if someone is trying to mount a gluster volume on a system where these packages are not installed?

Does it effect existing installations after upgrading to 3.6?

What happens if someone is running older versions of glusterfs-fuse and glusterfs-cli, and trying to work with newer  version of glusterfs server? Before this patch, older version were upgraded because of the dependency, but after this patch we will have a version mismatch - right?

It seems that this change requires manual installation/upgrade of the glusterfs packages on hosts using glusterfs - right?
Line 18: 
Line 19: Change-Id: I4cf424e7055ad071561d037b65972dde3b1b0b8b


-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.ovirt.org/43097
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I4cf424e7055ad071561d037b65972dde3b1b0b8b
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Project: vdsm
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Ala Hino <ahino at redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Allon Mureinik <amureini at redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Eyal Edri <eedri at redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins CI
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yaniv Bronhaim <ybronhei at redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: automation at ovirt.org
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes


More information about the vdsm-patches mailing list