[NEW PATCH] BZ#602338 vdsm-reg: take fingerprint param into consideration (via gerrit-bot)

Dan Kenigsberg danken at redhat.com
Wed Aug 17 19:53:17 UTC 2011


New patch submitted by Dan Kenigsberg (danken at redhat.com)

You can review this change at: http://gerrit.usersys.redhat.com/829

commit 0fcc517b34d23531e9b07c8b38e55b5e42894d71
Author: Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Aug 17 22:51:01 2011 +0300

    BZ#602338 vdsm-reg: take fingerprint param into consideration
    
    Without this spelling error fixed, management_server_fingerprint
    parameter is always ignored.
    
    Change-Id: I6c467ab6fdaf7d7869fd48dc9103d5fb82e964cb

diff --git a/vdsm_reg/vdsm-config b/vdsm_reg/vdsm-config
index b341588..fec26df 100755
--- a/vdsm_reg/vdsm-config
+++ b/vdsm_reg/vdsm-config
@@ -82,8 +82,8 @@ set_addresses() {
 					/etc/vdsm-reg/vdsm-reg.conf
 			fi
 
-			if [ ! -z "$managment_server_fingerprint" ]; then
-				res=`python "$DEPLOY_UTIL" --download-rhevm-cert --server-address="$vdc_managment_server" --server-port="$vdc_managment_port" --fingerprint="$managment_server_fingerprint"`
+			if [ ! -z "$management_server_fingerprint" ]; then
+				res=`python "$DEPLOY_UTIL" --download-rhevm-cert --server-address="$vdc_managment_server" --server-port="$vdc_managment_port" --fingerprint="$management_server_fingerprint"`
 				ret_val=$?
 				echo "$res" >> $LOG 2>&1
 				if [ ! $ret_val -eq 0 ];then




More information about the vdsm-patches mailing list