[vdsm] suggesting new Vdsm maintaniner(s)

Yaniv Bronheim ybronhei at redhat.com
Thu Aug 22 10:17:18 UTC 2013



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michal Skrivanek" <michal.skrivanek at redhat.com>
> To: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken at redhat.com>, "Itamar Heim" <iheim at redhat.com>, board at ovirt.org
> Cc: vdsm-devel at fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:53:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] suggesting new Vdsm maintaniner(s)
> 
> 
> On Aug 8, 2013, at 11:00 , Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:55:07PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> >> Nominating Toni Puimedon and/or Mark Wu as maintainers
> >> ======================================================
> >> 
> >> During their recent year-or-two of participation in Vdsm development,
> >> both Toni and Mark has demonstrated a genuine care for the health and
> >> evolution of the the project.
> >> 
> >> They both carry this hard-to-quantify quality of serious-mindedness when
> >> reviewing patches.
> >> 
> >> Toni's 73 committed patches touch everything that is related to network
> >> configuration and reporting
> >> 
> >>     27 vdsm/configNetwork.py
> >>     11 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py
> >>      8 vdsm/API.py
> >>      8 tests/configNetworkTests.py
> >>      7 vdsm/netinfo.py
> >>      7 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py
> >>      5 vdsm/libvirtvm.py
> >>      4 vdsm/netmodels.py
> >> 
> >> ... similar to Mark's 80:
> >> 
> >>     16 vdsm/configNetwork.py
> >>     12 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py
> >>     12 vdsm/libvirtvm.py
> >>      7 vdsm/clientIF.py
> >>      6 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py
> >>      5 vdsm/caps.py
> >>      5 vdsm/API.py
> >>      4 vdsm/vm.py
> >>      4 vdsm/netmodels.py
> >>      4 vdsm/Makefile.am
> >> 
> >> I suggest that both of them obtain +2/-2 rights, in the understanding
> >> that they are to be used on net-related parts of the code. This is
> >> particularly important given my nearing, relatively long, vacation.
> >> 
> >> What do you say?
> > 
> > We've got no objectation, but neither an overwhelming support. Maybe
> > it's due to the summer season.
> 
> Likely. My late loud +1
> 
> 
> > To me, it is important to tell whether Toni/Mark only reviewed a patch
> > (+1) or are completely standing behind it, and going to fix bugs in it
> > if the author is run over by a bus (God forbid).
> > 
> > Itamar and other board members: if there is no objection within, say,
> > one week, would you grant the duo +2 rights?
> 
> Sounds like the time is now…

Agreed, delaying it just overloads Federico during the recent period.
With adding new maintainers I hope we'll have more attendance in vdsm calls and contributes will receive faster response and help

Thanks,
Yaniv Bronhaim.

> 
> 
> > Dan.
> > _______________________________________________
> > vdsm-devel mailing list
> > vdsm-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vdsm-devel mailing list
> vdsm-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
>


More information about the vdsm-devel mailing list