[SSSD-users] recommended sssd version

Daniel Jung mimianddaniel at gmail.com
Thu May 22 20:55:44 UTC 2014

Hi Jakub,

I was curious on how the servers with same priority with weights were
implemented, the wording in RFC on this algorithm was a bit hard to
visualize for me and whether this was strictly followed. Also, at which
timeout setting is applied for cases where selected server is not reachable
and next server is selected and connected? Would this be same timeout
setting when using multiple servers with URI instead of DN?

Thanks for all the information.

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:01:42PM -0700, Daniel Jung wrote:
> > thanks for the response guys. just one more question on the topic of SRV
> > records, does sssd implementation folllow srv rfc closely?  would i need
> to
> > dig into the code to find this?
> As far as I know it does, the code was modeled after the RFC. Is there
> any particular functionality that you are concerned about?
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-users mailing list
> sssd-users at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-users/attachments/20140522/50be778f/attachment.html>

More information about the sssd-users mailing list