[SSSD-users] recommended sssd version

Daniel Jung mimianddaniel at gmail.com
Wed May 21 06:01:42 UTC 2014

thanks for the response guys. just one more question on the topic of SRV
records, does sssd implementation folllow srv rfc closely?  would i need to
dig into the code to find this?
 On May 20, 2014 3:28 AM, "Jakub Hrozek" <jhrozek at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:59:13PM -0700, Daniel Jung wrote:
> > Thanks for the info guys. With PCI compliance issue, I would try to
> > stick with what's avail from offiicial RHEL first.
> > Can someone from the list share their experience with SSSD with SRV
> > records? timeout issue/failover/offline auth are things I am
> > interested in hearing. Any caveats or issues they had experienced in
> > the past? I did notice there are few bugs that were fixed in the
> > latter version of SSSD related to SRV implementation which is the
> > reason, I was somewhat hesitant to use old package.
> >
> > Thanks again guys.
> The bugs we fixed in 1.9 were mostly related to recovery after the SRV
> record could not be resolved. IIRC also a better way to handle per-request
> timeouts was added after the RHEL5 version was released. In the general
> case (not taking features like AD sites into account), the failover code
> has
> been fairly stable.
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-users mailing list
> sssd-users at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-users/attachments/20140520/32a8ba9c/attachment.html>

More information about the sssd-users mailing list