[SSSD-users] Slow convergence between sssd and windows 2008 r2 ad server

Paul Liljenberg liljenberg.paul at gmail.com
Tue May 13 06:46:05 UTC 2014


Ok, i can see the patches. It cant figure out which one is for master and
which is for 1.11 branch. It sais 1.9 on the bottom of the patch messages.


On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Paul Liljenberg
<liljenberg.paul at gmail.com>wrote:

> Is there any status updates on the backport for ssd?
>
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Paul Liljenberg <
> liljenberg.paul at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If the sssd package is able to be installed via an apt repo in
>> /etc/apt/sources.list we are able to use it. It doesnt matter if its
>> located in ppa as long as debian stable can install from it.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Lukas Slebodnik <lslebodn at redhat.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On (07/05/14 10:37), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> >On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:50:39AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> >> On (07/05/14 09:29), Paul Liljenberg wrote:
>>> >> >hm in the last working setup i used 1.11 branch with the ad
>>> provider. To be
>>> >> >sure successful signon works it would be nice to have some reference
>>> config
>>> >> >that we know works with that branch. (
>>> >> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Configuring_sssd_with_ad_server)
>>> Ive
>>> >> >only seen this for the ad provider. Do we need samba-dev to build the
>>> >> >adprovider for 1.9 branch aswell?
>>> >>
>>> >> The 1.9 branch has ad provider, but there isn't strict dependency on
>>> samba-dev.
>>> >> Of course, there are not all features from 1.11 branch.
>>> >>
>>> >> I could not find in source code why samba is optional in 1.9 branch.
>>> >> Someone else should explain this.
>>> >>
>>> >> LS
>>> >
>>> >According to a bit of git digging, the unconditional samba4-libs
>>> >dependency was added when site discovery support was implemented.
>>> >
>>> >I'm not sure if you're talking about a proper Debian/Ubuntu backport or
>>> >some kind of PPA, but wouldn't it be easiest for a PPA to not package
>>> >the AD back end at all and only package the LDAP provider? The current
>>> >1.8 users are using LDAP only anyway..
>>> If you want to pacakge 1.11 branch on debian stable you will need to
>>> build it.
>>> If you want to build 1.11 branch on debian stable you will need to
>>> install
>>> samba4 develompment header files.  samba-dev is not available on debian
>>> stable.
>>>
>>> LS
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sssd-users mailing list
>>> sssd-users at lists.fedorahosted.org
>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards
>> Paul Liljenberg
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards
> Paul Liljenberg
>



-- 
Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards
Paul Liljenberg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-users/attachments/20140513/4707afe9/attachment.html>


More information about the sssd-users mailing list