[SSSD-users] Slow convergence between sssd and windows 2008 r2 ad server

Paul Liljenberg liljenberg.paul at gmail.com
Mon May 12 11:37:45 UTC 2014


Is there any status updates on the backport for ssd?


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Paul Liljenberg
<liljenberg.paul at gmail.com>wrote:

> If the sssd package is able to be installed via an apt repo in
> /etc/apt/sources.list we are able to use it. It doesnt matter if its
> located in ppa as long as debian stable can install from it.
>
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Lukas Slebodnik <lslebodn at redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> On (07/05/14 10:37), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:50:39AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> On (07/05/14 09:29), Paul Liljenberg wrote:
>> >> >hm in the last working setup i used 1.11 branch with the ad provider.
>> To be
>> >> >sure successful signon works it would be nice to have some reference
>> config
>> >> >that we know works with that branch. (
>> >> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Configuring_sssd_with_ad_server)
>> Ive
>> >> >only seen this for the ad provider. Do we need samba-dev to build the
>> >> >adprovider for 1.9 branch aswell?
>> >>
>> >> The 1.9 branch has ad provider, but there isn't strict dependency on
>> samba-dev.
>> >> Of course, there are not all features from 1.11 branch.
>> >>
>> >> I could not find in source code why samba is optional in 1.9 branch.
>> >> Someone else should explain this.
>> >>
>> >> LS
>> >
>> >According to a bit of git digging, the unconditional samba4-libs
>> >dependency was added when site discovery support was implemented.
>> >
>> >I'm not sure if you're talking about a proper Debian/Ubuntu backport or
>> >some kind of PPA, but wouldn't it be easiest for a PPA to not package
>> >the AD back end at all and only package the LDAP provider? The current
>> >1.8 users are using LDAP only anyway..
>> If you want to pacakge 1.11 branch on debian stable you will need to
>> build it.
>> If you want to build 1.11 branch on debian stable you will need to install
>> samba4 develompment header files.  samba-dev is not available on debian
>> stable.
>>
>> LS
>> _______________________________________________
>> sssd-users mailing list
>> sssd-users at lists.fedorahosted.org
>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards
> Paul Liljenberg
>



-- 
Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards
Paul Liljenberg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-users/attachments/20140512/cf34144d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the sssd-users mailing list