[SSSD-users] Slow convergence between sssd and windows 2008 r2 ad server

Lukas Slebodnik lslebodn at redhat.com
Wed May 7 08:43:47 UTC 2014

On (07/05/14 10:37), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:50:39AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (07/05/14 09:29), Paul Liljenberg wrote:
>> >hm in the last working setup i used 1.11 branch with the ad provider. To be
>> >sure successful signon works it would be nice to have some reference config
>> >that we know works with that branch. (
>> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Configuring_sssd_with_ad_server) Ive
>> >only seen this for the ad provider. Do we need samba-dev to build the
>> >adprovider for 1.9 branch aswell?
>> The 1.9 branch has ad provider, but there isn't strict dependency on samba-dev.
>> Of course, there are not all features from 1.11 branch.
>> I could not find in source code why samba is optional in 1.9 branch.
>> Someone else should explain this.
>> LS
>According to a bit of git digging, the unconditional samba4-libs
>dependency was added when site discovery support was implemented.
>I'm not sure if you're talking about a proper Debian/Ubuntu backport or
>some kind of PPA, but wouldn't it be easiest for a PPA to not package
>the AD back end at all and only package the LDAP provider? The current
>1.8 users are using LDAP only anyway..
If you want to pacakge 1.11 branch on debian stable you will need to build it.
If you want to build 1.11 branch on debian stable you will need to install
samba4 develompment header files.  samba-dev is not available on debian


More information about the sssd-users mailing list