[SSSD-users] Slow convergence between sssd and windows 2008 r2 ad server
liljenberg.paul at gmail.com
Wed May 7 07:29:46 UTC 2014
hm in the last working setup i used 1.11 branch with the ad provider. To be
sure successful signon works it would be nice to have some reference config
that we know works with that branch. (
only seen this for the ad provider. Do we need samba-dev to build the
adprovider for 1.9 branch aswell?
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Lukas Slebodnik <lslebodn at redhat.com> wrote:
> On (07/05/14 10:13), Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> >On 07.05.2014 10:07, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (07/05/14 09:59), Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> >>> On 02.05.2014 12:15, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>> On (02/05/14 11:03), Paul Liljenberg wrote:
> >>>>> Unfortuneately im tied to current debian stable in this setup and
> >>>>> backporting sssd does not seem possible. Thanx Steve.
> >>>> I asked debian maintaner of sssd(Timo). Whether it would be possible
> >>>> have sssd-1.9.6 in wheezy-backports.
> >>>> 11:09 < lslebodn> tjaalton: Will it be possible to have sssd-1.9 in
> >>>> (wheezy-backport)?
> >>>> 11:25 < tjaalton> lslebodn: maybe
> >>>> Paul, you can try to persuade him to do it :-)
> >>>> I added Timo to CC.
> >>> yes, I'm aware of this request.. have a chroot ready for build tests,
> >>> trying to figure out which packaging branch to use as the base, since
> >>> 1.9.x never got in Debian..
> >> 1.9 is the last branch which can be build without samba4 (samba-dev)
> >> and I was not able to find samba-dev in wheezy
> >right, I'll just use the 1.8.x packaging and some fixes cherry-picked
> If you want I have a "Work in progres patch" which disable ipa and ad
> in 1.11 branch and thus 1.11 branch can be compiled without samba4
> sssd-users mailing list
> sssd-users at lists.fedorahosted.org
Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the sssd-users