[SSSD-users] Slow convergence between sssd and windows 2008 r2 ad server

Paul Liljenberg liljenberg.paul at gmail.com
Wed May 7 07:11:16 UTC 2014


The reason not to use 1.11 branch is that libc is a higher version as a
dependency than the one debian 7.5 has wich means that building would break
anything else. I have only successfully compiled sssd 1.9 branch for debian
stable. I would be nice to have 1.11 branch working but i believe we are
trying to stretch things to far.


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> On 02.05.2014 12:15, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (02/05/14 11:03), Paul Liljenberg wrote:
> >> Unfortuneately im tied to current debian stable in this setup and
> >> backporting sssd does not seem possible. Thanx Steve.
> >>
> > I asked debian maintaner of sssd(Timo). Whether it would be possible to
> > have sssd-1.9.6 in wheezy-backports.
> >
> > 11:09 < lslebodn> tjaalton: Will it be possible to have sssd-1.9 in
> wheezy
> > (wheezy-backport)?
> > 11:25 < tjaalton> lslebodn: maybe
> >
> > Paul, you can try to persuade him to do it :-)
> > I added Timo to CC.
>
> yes, I'm aware of this request.. have a chroot ready for build tests,
> trying to figure out which packaging branch to use as the base, since
> 1.9.x never got in Debian..
>
>
> --
> t
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-users mailing list
> sssd-users at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
>



-- 
Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards
Paul Liljenberg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-users/attachments/20140507/bcdf4636/attachment.html>


More information about the sssd-users mailing list