[SSSD-users] using SSSD with nscd

Daniel Jung mimianddaniel at gmail.com
Wed Jun 11 19:30:32 UTC 2014


Thats very interesting. Have you seen noticeable improvement using outbound
vs nscd from performance ?

Thanks


On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Simo Sorce <simo at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 13:29 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > On 06/11/2014 08:06 AM, Daniel Jung wrote:
> > > Thanks! And totally agree with nscd being a crap
> >
> >
> > SSSD provides fast caching of users and groups similar to nscd.
> > For other maps you have to decide what tool is best. Nscd is an option
> > but we really want to hear about the reason why it is needed.
> > dnsmasq is a preferred solution for hosts.
>
> Actually in Fedora we are proposing to install unbound by default as
> caching name server because it can do DNSSEC properly.
>
> So in general we favor a proper DNS caching daemon over nscd.
>
> Simo.
>
> --
> Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
>
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-users mailing list
> sssd-users at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-users/attachments/20140611/d0455413/attachment.html>


More information about the sssd-users mailing list