[SSSD-users] ddns updates not required?

steve steve at steve-ss.com
Sun Jun 8 10:15:00 UTC 2014

On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 18:49 +0100, John Hodrien wrote:
> On 7 Jun 2014 18:38, steve <steve at steve-ss.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> > Thanks.
> > Yes, same here. Even though bind allows the signed updates from sssd, we
> > don't need them. We can authenticate using sssd no matter what IP is
> > assigned and no matter what is stored in AD. Maybe the ddns requirement
> > could be removed from the default ad-backend?
> You can hijack a keytab from another machine and use it for sssd, so correct DNS really doesn't matter for pure sssd operation.  You'll only cause bother for things using kerberos auth as a service (say samba/http/NFS/SSH), which if you like such things is a big deal.

It doesn't seem to matter either. sssd autofs cifs works fine
irrespective of dns. 

More information about the sssd-users mailing list