[SSSD] [PATCHES] DYNDNS: support mult. interfaces for dyndns_iface opt

Martin Basti mbasti at redhat.com
Mon Jul 13 10:04:23 UTC 2015


On 10/07/15 20:16, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 05:52:20PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
>> On 10/07/15 16:55, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 01:17:44PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>>> While reading #2558 I noticed that there is a further request relating to
>>>> these patches - mbasti asks If there could be some mean how to send IPs of
>>>> all interfaces?
>>>> Is this a good idea in general?
>>>> I suppose I could implement it with some special value for 'dyndns_iface' -
>>>> ideally the special value would contain characters prohibited to be part of
>>>> interface name if there are such...
>>> I would say this looks like a useful feature in general, but can you ask
>>> Martin why he needs this feature? I think the time has come for 1.13
>>> development to start turning into bug fixing more, so unless there is
>>> really some particular use-case, please move the ticket into 1.14.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sssd-devel mailing list
>>> sssd-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
>> This is blocker for https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4249
>>
>> Without this patch we cannot add dualstack and  multihomed support to IPA
>> clients, because when IPA adds all IP and IPv6 addresses to DNS, then SSSD
>> just deletes all records and put there just one address.
> I can see the argument for dualstack -- we shouldn't remove v6 addresses
> if we're talking to the server over v4 and conversely. I suspect the
> multi-homed use-case is a bit less important, right?
Yes multihomed support is less important.

>
>> We want to support dualstack in IPA for long time. Several users wanted
>> dualstack, even multihomed support.
> Is there a corresponding IPA ticket or some link to a freeipa-users
> thread?
>
> Please note I agree with the technical requirement, but there's limited
> time, so we should prioritize.
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

IPv6 IPA tickets:

https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/query?keywords=~ipv6&status=!closed

Martin^2




More information about the sssd-devel mailing list