[SSSD] sss_ssh_authorizedkeys: add a flag for ppolicy ?

Pavel Reichl preichl at redhat.com
Wed Apr 15 11:20:53 UTC 2015



On 04/15/2015 12:10 PM, Olivier wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I saw couple of discussion around in this list as well as others
> about how to exploit ppolicy with ssh : here are some thought.
>
> Currently, I am in a situation where I have inserted my users
> public ssh keys in ldap (openssh-ldappubkey shema) and
> instructed sshd to consult ldap for ssh public keys, adding in
> ssh_config :
>
> AuthorizedKeysCommand /usr/bin/sss_ssh_authorizedkeys
>
> I also have authorized password authentication , in ssh_config:
>
> PasswordAuthentication yes
>
> My current policy is the following :
>
> - All my users must have a password in ldap (that is used by
>    applications other than ssh)
>
> - not all my users may have an ssh key (some never use ssh)
>
> Everything works as I want.
>
> I now want to introduce ppolicy overlay and would like to enforce
> rules for password management even for users that mainly use
> ssh keys.
>
> Practically and basically : when a user with valid ssh key ask for
> an ssh connexion, I would like ssh to behave exactly as if this user
> had typed a correct "loging/password"  and therefore check for
> ppolicy situation before granting access.
>
> aka :
> - if the account is 'ppolicy desactivated', ssh would refuse to
>    provide the session
>
> - if the password is "ppolicy oudated", then ssh would warn to
>   change it (and decrease 'pwdGraceAuthnLimit/'/?)
>
> ... and so on.
>
> I thought about two options/alternatives to do that :
>
> * try to tune pam (may be there would be a way to tell pam to check
>    for user ppolicy fields once authentication has been done before
>    granting access ?)
>
> * add some sort of flag (aka: --ppolicy) to sss_ssh_authorizedkeys
>    to instruct sss_ssh_authorizedkeys to check for user ppolicy (use
>    'ldap_default_bind_dn' as a binding user) and if there is an issue
>     return a "ppolicy error message" rather than  the user ssh key ?
>
> These are just some thoughts.
>
> I'm currently exploring the first option (but I'm not a 'pam' expert and
> I'm even not sure that the ssh authentication process goes through
> pam if a valid key is found, even with 'UsePAM yes').
>
> I would appreciate any guidance, advices or experiences from you
> on that particular issue.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> Olivier
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Hello Olivier,

are you aware of 'ldap_access_order' option and its values (see man 
sssd-ldap) , could that help you?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20150415/74e1ffa2/attachment.html>


More information about the sssd-devel mailing list