[SSSD] [PATCH] nss: Preserve case of group members

Michal Židek mzidek at redhat.com
Thu Oct 2 12:19:06 UTC 2014


On 10/02/2014 01:59 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 10/02/2014 02:09 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
>> On 10/02/2014 10:42 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>> On 10/02/2014 12:54 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>> On (01/10/14 20:19), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>>>> On 10/01/2014 06:33 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:58:37PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/01/2014 04:09 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> see attached simple patch that fixes ticket:
>>>>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2453
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Michal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patch fixes the problem. ACK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * master: f6e008fe677ffcf8781c1d5154544066ea7ca9d4
>>>>>
>>>>> A CI job for this commit has failed on Debian:
>>>>> http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/1/22/summary.html
>>>>>
>>>>> in test-negcache test:
>>>>> http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/1/22/debian_testing/ci-build-debug/test-negcache.log
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nick
>>>> Works for me without any problem on clean, minimal, up to date
>>>> installation of
>>>> debian-jessie and ubuntu 14.04.
>>>
>>> Yes, it was probably a non-reproducible "fluke", but it's worth being
>>> aware
>>> of. I haven't seen it fail ever before.
>>
>> It looks like the execution of the test slowed
>> down (was paused or whatever) and the negative cache expired.
>> Maybe the VM did not have enough resources from the host and
>> slowed down execution. Or some other random strangeness.
>
> Ah, thank you Michal. It then joins the dyndns test (and some other) in the
> group of timing-dependent tests. We'll have to do something about these.
> The
> VM environment load is not very predictable and it's better not to have
> randomly-failing tests in CI for whatever reason. Can we somehow
> increase the
> time window size for them, perhaps?
>
> Thank you.

Increasing the time window is possible. It is currently set to
one second in the tests. If it fails in the future again, we
can double it. But one second should be really a lot for what
it does so I would keep it as is for now.

Michal



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list