[SSSD] [PATCH 1/1] tests: Don't assume absolute test dir in test_io.c

Nikolai Kondrashov Nikolai.Kondrashov at redhat.com
Fri May 16 22:14:29 UTC 2014


On 05/16/2014 11:32 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (16/04/14 21:30), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>> In my case there is no beneficial performance difference when running with
>> valgrind. There is about 25% improvement using /dev/shm when running with
>> coverage enabled, but even in a VM it takes less than a minute on my machine.
>>
> I was waiting for pshing patch to the upstream.
> This is a reason of late reply.
>
>> I will use /dev/shm and will mess with moving test results around, when/if
>> I'll need to tune the performance, but for now I'd prefer to keep my CI code
>> simple and use relative directories.
>>
> I have totally different results. The most problematic is sysdb test,
> because there is a lof of IO operations.

I admit I didn't test this thoroughly and might have hit a corner case and
perhaps I was biased. I'll retry my tests properly once I get to the point of
optimizing performance.

Thanks for testing and posting your results, Lukas.

Sincerely,
Nick



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list