[SSSD] Design Discussion: Simple D-Bus API

Pavel Březina pbrezina at redhat.com
Thu Mar 13 14:24:22 UTC 2014


On 03/10/2014 06:14 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 03:02:30PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> Fair enough. I saw both complaints from potential consumers -- some
>> developers were going "omg dbus is such a heavyweight desktop technology,
>> do I really need to use it" ? I realize 'hiding' dbus behind a different
>> name might be a little irrational, but so were their concerns in my
>> opinion.
>
> I think as long as well call it the D-Bus responder we should keep dbus
> in the names. Otherwise we might get questions like 'How do I start the
> InfoPipe responder?'.

It is actually already confusing. We never use anything else than D-Bus 
responder, but the responder itself in Jakub's branch is called ifp.



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list