[SSSD] [PATCH v2 1/5] NEW CLIENT: plugin for NFSv4 rpc.idmapd

Jakub Hrozek jhrozek at redhat.com
Mon Jun 23 07:55:14 UTC 2014


On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 09:34:54PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > I would prefer that, yes. 
> 
> I would prefer not.
> 
> > I am hoping other SSSD developers would chime in as well so that the
> > decision is not a one man party, but I personally prefer the code to
> > read consistently. If the socket underneath is a shared NSS one or a
> > NFS one is an implementation detail.
> 
> But it has extremely important consequences on locking and thread
> safety, and using aliases, while it may help readability in some areas
> can also be quite confusing from the coherency POV.
> 
> Simo.

OK, what is your proposal?



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list