[SSSD] [RFC] Add basic support for CI test execution

Lukas Slebodnik lslebodn at redhat.com
Mon Jun 16 09:30:45 UTC 2014


On (14/06/14 12:06), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>On 06/14/2014 11:55 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (14/06/14 10:47), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>>On 06/14/2014 12:56 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>>On (13/06/14 23:26), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>>>>On 06/13/2014 10:28 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>>Let's summarize.
>>>
>>>Sure, it was satisfying deleting that much quotation :)
>>>
>>>>I don't like maintaing build dependecies in two different palaces
>>>>and you don't want to extract build dependencies from spec file.
>>>>We need to find a compromise. What do you propose?
>>>
>>>Can we agree on an acceptable level of dependency syncing, past initial
>>>development?
>>>
>>>Let's say, once we see four commits to contrib/ci/deps.sh related to Red Hat
>>>distro dependencies in a month, we'll switch to pulling them from the .spec
>>>file.
>>If you consider rhel6 then it is not a compromise. It is a duplication
>>of maintaining conditional build dependencies for different platforms
>>(rhel6, fedora) in two different places. It is not a simplification
>>and purpose of CI should be to simplify developers workflow.
>
>I'm sorry, but that's my offer for now.
>
>It's not a compromise, unless both of the sides yield their position at least
>a little. I think I did yield mine, what's your offer :)?
>
Current version of script is unusable for rhel6.
I will accept compromise if we want to test sssd master branch on rhel >= 7.

LS



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list