[SSSD] [PATCH] CI: Update valgrind suppresion database for libselinux

Nikolai Kondrashov Nikolai.Kondrashov at redhat.com
Wed Dec 3 19:44:17 UTC 2014


On 12/03/2014 07:23 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (03/12/14 18:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:18:33AM -0500, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Nikolai Kondrashov" <Nikolai.Kondrashov at redhat.com>
>>>> To: "Development of the System Security Services Daemon" <sssd-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 4:00:14 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] CI: Update valgrind suppresion database for	libselinux
>>>>
>>>> On 12/03/2014 04:23 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>>>   From 7f041a011f44a8fb1c128095ad55c0669287209d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>> From: Lukas Slebodnik<lslebodn at redhat.com>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 14:34:43 +0100
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] CI: Update valgrind suppresion database for libselinux
>>>>>
>>>>> problem is already fixed in fedora >= 21
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Lukas!
>>>> Do you have any information on what the problem was?
>>>>
>>> I'm sorry it isn't important information for me.
>>> Problem is fixed on fedora 21. And that's al what I need to know.
>>>
>>> LS
>>
>> Can you change the name as Nikolai requested so that we can push the
>> patch and unbreak CI?
> I do not see a reason why there should be prefix sssd-
>
> The problem is in libselinux and not in sssd.

Yes, but this way we'll also be able to see that it is *our* suppression and
not some other package suppression from /usr/lib64/valgrind.

Nick



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list