[SSSD] [sssd][patch] SYSDB: sysdb_getnetgr returns ENOENT
Lukas Slebodnik
lslebodn at redhat.com
Thu Aug 28 08:31:53 UTC 2014
On (11/07/14 17:28), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 10:51 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 17:28 +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>> > > Error: PW.NON_CONST_PRINTF_FORMAT_STRING:
>> > > sssd-1.11.92/src/db/sysdb_ops.c:109: non_const_printf_format_string:
>> > format string is not a string literal, potential security
>> > vulnerability if user controlled
>> > > sssd-1.11.92/src/db/sysdb_ops.c:109: caretline:
>> > >
>> > > I prefer to avoid compiler warnings. It will be better to use NULL.
>> >
>> > (lret = ldb_search(ldb, mem_ctx, _result, base, scope, attrs, NULL);)
>> >
>> > It's a common practice in SSSD anyway.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be simpler to use a macro in this case ?
>> Your new fuinction hjas to go through variadic expansion prematurely,
>> and adds a lot of code:
>>
>> something like:
>> #define sss_ldbn_seartch(ret, arguments, etc., format, ...) {
>> do {
>> int result = ldb_search(argumets, etc, format, ##__VA_ARGS__);
>> ret = result;
>> if (res->count == 0) {
>> ret = ENOENT;
>> }
>> } while(0);
>>
>>
>Hello,
>
>sorry for late reply. I guess your approach will definitely save some
>lines of code and some CPU cycles.
>
>I just must get used to the idea that macros are not considered evil in
>out environment. :-)
>
>Please see attached patch.
>
>Regards,
>
>Pavel Reichl
>
>From d1293b63adcab4298228af225f3af5803759d34b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Pavel Reichl <preichl at redhat.com>
>Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:21:59 +0100
>Subject: [PATCH] SYSDB: SSS_LDB_SEARCH - macro around ldb_search
>
>This patch amends previous patch 5153e8b9793dea1e212ca08af0f77ea1d023cbb7.
>
>Macro SSS_LDB_SEARCH is used instead of using fuction sss_ldb_search as
>a wrapper around ldb_search which could lead to premature expansion of
>variadic parameters.
>
>Part of solution for:
>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1991
>---
> src/db/sysdb.h | 19 +++++++++++++-----
> src/db/sysdb_ops.c | 51 -------------------------------------------------
> src/db/sysdb_search.c | 10 +++++-----
> src/tests/sysdb-tests.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/src/db/sysdb.h b/src/db/sysdb.h
>index 17cd5110c9bdafd8d7b18e621188523ed41e5c8a..a613c84ffa9e4ab6ebdc930a8c4876e69aa3cd13 100644
>--- a/src/db/sysdb.h
>+++ b/src/db/sysdb.h
>@@ -481,11 +481,6 @@ int sysdb_get_netgroup_attr(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
> const char **attributes,
> struct ldb_result **res);
>
>-errno_t sss_ldb_search(struct ldb_context *ldb, TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
>- struct ldb_result **_result, struct ldb_dn *base,
>- enum ldb_scope scope, const char * const *attrs,
>- const char *exp_fmt, ...) SSS_ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF(7, 8);
>-
> /* functions that modify the databse
> * they have to be called within a transaction
> * See sysdb_transaction_send()/_recv() */
>@@ -864,4 +859,18 @@ errno_t sysdb_search_object_by_sid(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
> const char *sid_str,
> const char **attrs,
> struct ldb_result **msg);
>+
>+#define SSS_LDB_SEARCH(ret, ldb, mem_ctx, _result, base, scope, attrs, \
>+ exp_fmt, ...) \
>+{ \
>+ int lret; \
>+ \
>+ lret = ldb_search(ldb, mem_ctx, _result, base, scope, attrs, exp_fmt, \
>+ ##__VA_ARGS__); \
>+ ret = sysdb_error_to_errno(lret); \
>+ if (ret == EOK && (*_result)->count == 0) { \
>+ ret = ENOENT; \
>+ } \
>+} while(0)
Use do { } while(0); for macro, not just { } while(0)
@see macros SYSDB_VERSION_LOWER_ERROR, SYSDB_VERSION_HIGHER_ERROR,
DEBUG_PAM_DATA ...
Otherwise patch LGTM. If there are no other objections to this version I will
give ACK.
LS
More information about the sssd-devel
mailing list