[SSSD] should ad-gpo support additional logon rights?
Simo Sorce
simo at redhat.com
Mon Aug 11 16:10:28 UTC 2014
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 11:59 -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
>
> In our case, when a user calls "sudo ls", I think it is a three-step
> procedure:
> 1) sudo calls pam_authenticate to authenticate the user
> 2) sudo calls pam_acct_mgmt to make sure that the account is not
> locked, that the ldap/gpo policies permit the user to run sudo, etc
> 3) sudo refers to /etc/sudoers to determine if it can perform the sudo
> action (i.e. "ls").
>
> The GPO Logon Rights relate to step (2) of this procedure.
Except we do not have a logon right in windows that really matches what
sudo is/does ... besiodes given sudo does its own authorization checks,
what's the point of 2 ?
[..]
> Are you suggesting that sudo skip all of the pam_acct_mgmt checks
> (checking for locked accounts, ldap filter policies), or that it skip
> only the gpo policy check?
Yes I think that is what Michichael and I ended up agreeing is the most
sensible solution, given any other would prevent the rightful use of
sudo in some situations where it should be allowed.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
More information about the sssd-devel
mailing list