[SSSD] RFC: Backporting Nikolai's DEBUG patches to sssd-1-11

Lukas Slebodnik lslebodn at redhat.com
Tue Apr 29 13:59:41 UTC 2014


On (29/04/14 15:53), Sumit Bose wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
>> On 04/29/2014 03:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >we've been keeping the sssd-1-11 branch fairly conservative recently,
>> >mostly as a precaution to not break downstreams that consume sssd-1-11,
>> >like RHEL.
>> >
>> >But some relatively larger features, such as the InfoPipe responder,
>> >need to be backported to sssd-1-11 (and by extension to RHEL-6) now. One
>> >large difference between master and sssd-1-11 are the DEBUG messages and
>> >I'd like to propose that we backport the new DEBUG messages to sssd-1-11
>> >and mass-convert the callers the same way we did in master.
>> >
>> >I think backporting the DEBUG messages change would be relatively
>> >low-risk, as the messages don't generally affect the behaviour of the
>> >daemon.
>> >
>> >The big downside of course is that we break git-blame and cause a bit of
>> >churn in sssd-1-11. But I think this downside it outweighted by not
>> >having to backport each and every DEBUG message from patches we'll be
>> >pulling in from master to sssd-1-11, which is all the SBUS changes Stef
>> >did recently and also all the work on the IFP responder.
>> >
>> >The next step would be backporting the SBUS changes, but I'd prefer a
>> >separate thread about those.
>> >
>> >Thoughts?
>> 
>> +1
>
>+1
>
+1

LS



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list