[SSSD] [PATCHES] Sig handlers cleanups

Simo Sorce simo at redhat.com
Tue Nov 12 16:07:27 UTC 2013


On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 10:45 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:27:48AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:

> > ACK
> > 
> > While testing I came across an oddness which we might want to fix. The
> > sssd_be processes can receive SIGUSR1 individually and go offline. But
> > the SIGUSR2 is not handled by sssd_be directly but only by the monitor
> > which then send a reset offline request to all backends. Shall sssd_be
> > handle SIGUSR2 as well?
> > 
> > bye,
> > Sumit
> 
> Which patches should be pushed? #1 and #3 from the original mail and #2
> from the follow up?

yes.

> (on a tangent: Can we please always resend all patches?)

Sorry about that, I thought of sending them all, and then ...

(on a tangent: Can we please always trim the quoting when replying to
emails, we have some mails on this list that are thousands of line long
just to comment on a single phrase all the way down at the end)
SCNR :)

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York




More information about the sssd-devel mailing list