[SSSD] [PATCH] Split the providers into separate subpackages

Jakub Hrozek jhrozek at redhat.com
Mon Jun 10 18:30:29 UTC 2013


On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 08:24:10PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > When adding "Provides:" and "Obsoletes:", it is inappropriate to do
> > Obsoletes: libsss_sudo < %{version}-%{release}
> > 
> > The Fedora guidelines require that the Obsoletes: be a specific
> > version (the last one before the change occurred). So
> > 
> > Obsoletes: libsss_sudo <= 1.9.5
> > 
> 
> OK, in my defense I've seen these in some of the specfiles I've got cloned
> from Fedora's dist-git (not that it would make them correct).
> 
> I made the changes in the version that is attached, just with a
> differens version to compare against. I think your suggestion would make
> sense for a Fedora package, but in upstream, we want to obsolete all the
> nightly builds prior to the switch as well.
> 
> So I added another point version number (minor versions come cheap) and
> compared against 1.9.93.

I forgot to add that the new minor number would be removed after
releasing the next upstream version.



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list