[SSSD] problem with AD nested group expansion, maybe?

Greg.Lehmann at csiro.au Greg.Lehmann at csiro.au
Wed Dec 4 23:10:16 UTC 2013


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sssd-devel-bounces at lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
> bounces at lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of steve
> Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013 1:43 AM
> To: sssd-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> Subject: Re: [SSSD] problem with AD nested group expansion, maybe?
> 
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 15:13 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:24:58AM +0000, Greg.Lehmann at csiro.au
> wrote:
> > > Tell you what: You get RHEL to include it and I'll push SUSE about
> SLES. I
> > > mean 6.5 just came out and they did not increase the version by
> even a minor
> > > step over 6.4!
> >
> > Version numbers mean nothing in the enterprise world. To be precise,
> > what we have on RHEL6.5 is called sssd-1.9.2-129.el6 but in reality
> it's
> > upstream 1.9.6, just with patches applied on top of 1.9.2 tarball
> > instead of consuming the whole thing.
> >
> > The way I patch distribution packages is usually one bump of the
> release
> > number (that's 129 now) per fix, one fix may contain multiple
> patches.
> > So the 6.5 packages addressed 129 issues on top of 1.9.2
> 
> OK, so we can't use version numbers. But I can if I take the tarball
> from the sssd site?
> 
> In an attempt to avoid version numbers, the fact remains that no distro
> ships with the sssd which has a predictable ad backend. Something what
> I
> call v1.10. With 1.11.x being the one to have. Not just for ad but
> because it doesn't have all those niggly little problems like tose
> which
> the OP describes.
> <tongue in...>
> Maybe you should slow down your development to match the snail pace of
> that of sssd adoption by the distros. Or insist everyone switch to
> Fedora.
> </tongue in...>
> Cheers,
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel at lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

HaHaHa. Love it. Thanks for the laugh.

To be clear, are you saying you need at least 1.10 to get predictable behaviour with AD?


More information about the sssd-devel mailing list