[SSSD] [PATCH] Incorrect *.py[co] files placement

Jakub Hrozek jhrozek at redhat.com
Wed Apr 10 14:22:22 UTC 2013


On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:54:46AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Wed 27 Mar 2013 10:15:55 AM EDT, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> 
> > I see, does this guideline apply only for packages that are usable
> > on its own (only with python) or python packages in general? I
> > still think that it would be a strange guideline to require python
> > bindings for libfoo to be names python-libfoo and not
> > libfoo-python.
> > 
> 
> I took this to the Fedora packaging list and they came back with the
> preference that we should call it python-sssdconfig. They stopped
> short of making a firm decision on the libfoo-python question, but the
> conversation is ongoing.

Then I think Lukas's approach is fine. rpmbuild works OK, the packages
can be updated to and Requires look sane to me.

Packages that used to Require SSSD (such as freeipa-client) would get
the new subpackage as a dependency automatically.

Ack.



More information about the sssd-devel mailing list