[SSSD] [PATCHES] Support for ghost users

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Thu May 24 11:29:02 UTC 2012


On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 08:19 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 12:03 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:57:23PM +0200, Jan Zeleny wrote:
> > The sysdb upgrade script will segfault if any users in the database are
> > lacking memberOf links. This can happen if a user was requested via
> > getpwnam() or getpwuid() without an initgroups() call.
> > 
> > The attach patch should be squashed into patch 122.
> 
> Nice catch, thank you
> 
> > Additionally, I was trying to do some real-world comparisons but I
> > wasn't seeing any improvement (this was against an RFC 2307 server, not
> > RFC2307bis or FreeIPA, so that may be relevant).
> > 
> > Can you verify whether we expect to see improvement on such systems, or
> > only for RFC2307bis?
> 
> I don't know why we shouldn't expect any improvements for RFC2307. Can you 
> post me the scenario you tested?


Replied privately with confidential data.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/attachments/20120524/3ec58be7/attachment.sig>


More information about the sssd-devel mailing list